Clare Bates Congdon

35 papers receiving 685 citations

Peers

Clare Bates Congdon
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Molecular Biology 351
  • Cancer Research 255
  • Artificial Intelligence 191
  • Sociology and Political Science 57
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 51
Replace Juntao Liu with:
Juntao Liu China
Richard Röttger Denmark
Muhammad Tahir Pakistan
Chun-Hsi Huang United States
Andrew Lonie Australia
Rashid Mehmood China
Jonathan Chan United States
Shikhar Sharma United States
Kenji Satou Japan
Hirotoshi Taira Japan
Clare Bates Congdon relative to Juntao Liu China Juntao Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Juntao Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Clare Bates Congdon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Clare Bates Congdon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clare Bates Congdon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clare Bates Congdon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Clare Bates Congdon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clare Bates Congdon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clare Bates Congdon. The network helps show where Clare Bates Congdon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Clare Bates Congdon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Clare Bates Congdon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Clare Bates Congdon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Clare Bates Congdon. Clare Bates Congdon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 339
3 1
4 7
5 6
6 0
7 47
8 23
9 13
10 22
11
Considerations on undergraduate computer science research
2
12 4
13
Estimating patient's length of stay in the Emergency Department with an artificial neural network.
16
14 9
15 3
16
Gaphyl: An Evolutionary Algorithms Approach For The Study Of Natural Evolution
19
17
Integrating high-speed obstacle avoidance, global path planning, and vision sensing on a mobile robot
4
18
Winning the AAAI robot competition
2
19 15
20 2

About Clare Bates Congdon

Clare Bates Congdon is a scholar working on Architecture, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design and Computer Science Applications, having authored 41 papers that have together received 706 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Artificial Intelligence in Games (8 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (7 papers) and Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (255 citations), Artificial Intelligence (191 citations) and Molecular Biology (351 citations). Clare Bates Congdon has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey Thompson, Melanie Ufkin, Sarah Peterson, Lucy Liaw, Pradeep Sathyanarayana, Graham Kendall, Gerardo M. Nava, H. Rex Gaskins, Carolyn Mattingly and Tom Schaul. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Australasian Journal of Paramedicine and Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026