Amy C. Sturm
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 2%
- Genetics top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Surgery top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Co-authors
- Ray E. HershbergerTara SchmidlenAlanna Kulchak RahmM. SchwartzH. Lester KirchnerChristopher SemsarianAndrew P. LandstromStephan Moll
- Topics
- BRCA gene mutations in cancer (34 papers)Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (34 papers)Genomics and Rare Diseases (24 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Amy C. Sturm
96 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 919
- Genetics 825
- Molecular Biology 648
- Surgery 475
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 276
Countries citing papers authored by Amy C. Sturm
This map shows the geographic impact of Amy C. Sturm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amy C. Sturm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amy C. Sturm more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amy C. Sturm
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amy C. Sturm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amy C. Sturm. The network helps show where Amy C. Sturm may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amy C. Sturm
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amy C. Sturm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amy C. Sturm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amy C. Sturm. Amy C. Sturm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 43 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 71 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | Genetic Testing for Inherited Cardiovascular Diseases: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Associationbreakdown → | 211 |
| 15 | 98 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Amy C. Sturm
Amy C. Sturm is a scholar working on Genetics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery, having authored 103 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include BRCA gene mutations in cancer (34 papers), Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (34 papers) and Genomics and Rare Diseases (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (919 citations), Genetics (825 citations) and Health Informatics (21 citations). Amy C. Sturm has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ray E. Hershberger, Tara Schmidlen, Alanna Kulchak Rahm, M. Schwartz, H. Lester Kirchner, Christopher Semsarian, Andrew P. Landstrom, Stephan Moll, Liz Varga and Laney K. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Circulation and Nature Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.