Cindy Skach

1.2k citations
12 papers · 513 indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 8
Topics
Political Theology and Sovereignty (3 papers)Judicial and Constitutional Studies (3 papers)Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (2 papers)
Partner nations
United States

In The Last Decade

Cindy Skach

12 papers receiving 404 citations

Hit Papers

Constitutional Frameworks and Democratic Consolidation: P...19932026200420151993100200300

Peers

Cindy Skach
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Political Science and International Relations 422
  • Sociology and Political Science 295
  • Law 92
  • Economics and Econometrics 60
  • Strategy and Management 49
Replace Kathryn Stoner‐Weiss with:
Kathryn Stoner‐Weiss United States
Gerald M. Easter United States
Patrick J. Fett United States
Wonjae Hwang United States
Ben Tonra Ireland
Steven Blockmans Netherlands
Fernando Casal Bértoa United Kingdom
Björn Dressel Australia
Gerard Alexander United States
Elizabeth Haas United Kingdom
Cindy Skach relative to Kathryn Stoner‐Weiss United States Kathryn Stoner‐Weiss's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Kathryn Stoner‐Weiss · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cindy Skach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cindy Skach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cindy Skach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cindy Skach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cindy Skach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cindy Skach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cindy Skach. The network helps show where Cindy Skach may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cindy Skach

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cindy Skach. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cindy Skach based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cindy Skach. Cindy Skach is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
The Predicament of Semi-presidentialism
1
2 8
3
Democracies in Danger
1
4 43
5 10
6 44
7 9
8 1
9 19
10
Presidencialismo y parlamentarismo en perspectiva comparada
3
11
Presidentialism and parliamentarism in comparative perspective
29
12
Constitutional Frameworks and Democratic Consolidation: Parliamentarianism versus Presidentialismbreakdown →
345

About Cindy Skach

Cindy Skach is a scholar working on Law, History and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 12 papers that have together received 513 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Theology and Sovereignty (3 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (3 papers) and Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (422 citations), Law (92 citations) and Development (31 citations). Cindy Skach has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Alfred Stepan, Daniel Ziblatt, Stanley Hoffmann and Timothy J. Colton. Their work appears in journals such as Foreign Affairs, World Politics and Journal of democracy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026