Elizabeth Haas
About
In The Last Decade
Elizabeth Haas
2 papers receiving 466 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Political Science and International Relations 547
- Sociology and Political Science 144
- Strategy and Management 139
- Development 87
- Law 56
Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Haas
This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Haas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Haas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Haas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Haas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Haas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Haas. The network helps show where Elizabeth Haas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Haas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Haas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Haas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Haas. Elizabeth Haas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | The Uniting of Europe. Political, Social and Economical Forces, 1950-1957. breakdown → | 653 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.