Chunrye Kim

635 citations
35 papers · 361 · h-index 11

Impact in

  • Health top 5%
    • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
    • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
    • Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Papers in

Chunrye Kim

30 papers receiving 355 citations

Peers

Chunrye Kim
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Health 155
  • Gender Studies 78
  • Clinical Psychology 92
  • Reproductive Medicine 35
  • Sociology and Political Science 172
Replace Autumn M. Bermea with:
Autumn M. Bermea United States
Dena Hassouneh United States
Gita R. Mehrotra United States
Rajean Moone United States
Amy Butler United States
Jonel Thaller United States
Katherine Kortes-Miller Canada
Sofia Neves Portugal
McKenzie Javorka United States
Bibhuti K. Sar United States
Chunrye Kim relative to Autumn M. Bermea United States Autumn M. Bermea's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Autumn M. Bermea · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chunrye Kim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chunrye Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chunrye Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chunrye Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chunrye Kim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chunrye Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chunrye Kim. The network helps show where Chunrye Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 16 scholars most cited alongside Chunrye Kim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chunrye Kim Line = papers co-authored together Chunrye Kim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202072
2 201758
3 201925
4 201924
5 201722
6 201816
7 202215
8 202115
9 201812
10 201510
11 202210
12 202110
13 20189
14 20178
15 20157
16 20157
17 20216
18 20196
19 20225
20 20235

About Chunrye Kim

Chunrye Kim is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Health, Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies and Social Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 361 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intimate Partner and Family Violence (18 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (7 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (6 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (6 papers), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (5 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (5 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (4 papers) and Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (155 citations), Gender Studies (78 citations), Clinical Psychology (92 citations), Reproductive Medicine (35 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (172 citations). Chunrye Kim has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Amy Adamczyk, Joshua D. Freilich, Hung‐En Sung, Joel A. Capellan, Sujung Cho, Claire Seungeun Lee, Hyeyoung Lim, Katarzyna Celińska, Jeremy R. Porter and Douglas Evans. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Trauma Violence & Abuse, Violence Against Women, Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking and Aggression and Violent Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact