Chun‐Jung Chen
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Neurology top 5%
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 2%
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Su‐Lan LiaoWen‐Yin ChenFu‐Chou ChengHung-Chuan PanWen‐Ying ChenTsung-Kuei KaoChing-Wen WuShih‐Yi Lin
- Topics
- Nerve injury and regeneration (8 papers)Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (6 papers)Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONEBiochemical and Biophysical Research CommunicationsInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Partner nations
- TaiwanUnited StatesPanama
In The Last Decade
Chun‐Jung Chen
32 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Molecular Biology 293
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 279
- Neurology 212
- Complementary and alternative medicine 151
- Surgery 147
Countries citing papers authored by Chun‐Jung Chen
This map shows the geographic impact of Chun‐Jung Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chun‐Jung Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chun‐Jung Chen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chun‐Jung Chen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chun‐Jung Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chun‐Jung Chen. The network helps show where Chun‐Jung Chen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chun‐Jung Chen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chun‐Jung Chen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chun‐Jung Chen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chun‐Jung Chen. Chun‐Jung Chen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 29 | |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | 58 | |
| 12 | 43 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 42 | |
| 15 | 28 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 119 | |
| 18 | 129 | |
| 19 | 127 | |
| 20 | 52 |
About Chun‐Jung Chen
Chun‐Jung Chen is a scholar working on Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nerve injury and regeneration (8 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (6 papers) and Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (212 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (79 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (151 citations). Chun‐Jung Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Panama. Frequent co-authors include Su‐Lan Liao, Wen‐Yin Chen, Fu‐Chou Cheng, Hung-Chuan Pan, Wen‐Ying Chen, Tsung-Kuei Kao, Ching-Wen Wu, Shih‐Yi Lin, Shue‐Ling Raung and Yen‐Chuan Ou. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.