Christopher T. Lovelace
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Sensory Systems top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Nutrition and Dietetics
- Co-authors
- Peter G. GrossenbacherMark T. WallaceBarry E. SteinReza DerakhshaniDiane L. FilionConnie C. DuncanAllan F. MirskyWilliam H. Theodore
- Topics
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (5 papers)EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers)Multisensory perception and integration (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
Christopher T. Lovelace
19 papers receiving 647 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 492
- Sensory Systems 332
- Cognitive Neuroscience 327
- Social Psychology 176
- Nutrition and Dietetics 76
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher T. Lovelace
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher T. Lovelace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher T. Lovelace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher T. Lovelace more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher T. Lovelace
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher T. Lovelace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher T. Lovelace. The network helps show where Christopher T. Lovelace may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher T. Lovelace
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher T. Lovelace. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher T. Lovelace based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher T. Lovelace. Christopher T. Lovelace is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 201 | |
| 16 | International development assistance and health : the report of working group 6 of the Commission on Macroeconomics and Health | 6 |
| 17 | 339 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Christopher T. Lovelace
Christopher T. Lovelace is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 20 papers that have together received 673 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (5 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (332 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (492 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (327 citations). Christopher T. Lovelace has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Peter G. Grossenbacher, Mark T. Wallace, Barry E. Stein, Reza Derakhshani, Diane L. Filion, Connie C. Duncan, Allan F. Mirsky, William H. Theodore, Burton M. Slotnick and Elizabeth R. Duval. Their work appears in journals such as Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Psychophysiology and Cognitive Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.