Christopher Smith

458 citations
27 papers · 317 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Christopher Smith

25 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers

Christopher Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Nephrology 81
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 40
  • Urology 26
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 78
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 19
Replace Andrew Jenkins with:
Andrew Jenkins United Kingdom
Ifeoma Okoye Nigeria
Luiz Francisco Baccaro Brazil
Alice Bisbee United States
S Ségal United States
Ryan T. Fitzgerald United States
Diane J. Fink United States
Liming Yang China
Julie DeGroot Canada
Mohan Pai Canada
Christopher Smith relative to Andrew Jenkins United Kingdom Andrew Jenkins's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
Andrew Jenkins · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Smith. The network helps show where Christopher Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher Smith Line = papers co-authored together Christopher Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199672
2 200043
3 202030
4 202120
5 197920
6 202019
7 201214
8 202312
9 201712
10 202311
11 202411
12 20189
13 20168
14 20226
15 20206
16 20215
17 19965
18 20234
19 20183
20 20242

About Christopher Smith

Christopher Smith is a scholar working on Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Oncology, Sociology and Political Science, Nephrology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 27 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bone health and osteoporosis research (9 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (6 papers), Bone health and treatments (5 papers), Medical Imaging and Analysis (4 papers), Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments (3 papers), Clusterin in disease pathology (3 papers), Hip and Femur Fractures (3 papers) and Radiation Dose and Imaging (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (81 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (40 citations), Urology (26 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (78 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (19 citations). Christopher Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert L. Chevalier, Bo Abrahamsen, Ky Hyun Chung, R. Ariel Gómez, Ann Cartwright, Kirk Scott, Martin Dribe, Stanisław Krajewski, John C. Reed and Jennifer T. Wolstenholme. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, Bone, Pediatric Research, The Journal of Urology and Osteoporosis International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact