Cesar Libanati
About
In The Last Decade
Cesar Libanati
142 papers receiving 9.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
- Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 7.1k
- Oncology 5.1k
- Molecular Biology 4.4k
- Surgery 1.8k
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 747
Countries citing papers authored by Cesar Libanati
This map shows the geographic impact of Cesar Libanati's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cesar Libanati with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cesar Libanati more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cesar Libanati
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cesar Libanati. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cesar Libanati. The network helps show where Cesar Libanati may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cesar Libanati
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cesar Libanati. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cesar Libanati based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cesar Libanati. Cesar Libanati is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 44 | |
| 5 | 29 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | Relationship between total hip BMD T-score and incidence of nonvertebral fracture with up to 8 years of denosumab treatment | 5 |
| 8 | Strength at the Lumbar Spine and Hip Improves with Romosozumab Compared with Teriparatide in Postmenopausal Women with Low Bone Mass | 5 |
| 9 | Percentage of women achieving non-osteoporotic BMD T-scores at the spine and hip over 8 years of denosumab treatment | 1 |
| 10 | Further reduction in nonvertebral fracture rate is observed following 3 years of denosumab treatment: results with up to 7 years in the freedom extension | 4 |
| 11 | Romosozumab and Teriparatide Effects on Vertebral Cortical Mass, Thickness, and Density in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Mineral Density (BMD). | 5 |
| 12 | THE TRANSITORY PTH INCREASE FOLLOWING DENOSUMAB ADMINISTRATION IS ASSOCIATED WITH REDUCED INTRACORTICAL POROSITY: A DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERISTIC OF DENOSUMAB THERAPY | 1 |
| 13 | DENOSUMAB REDUCES INTRACORTICAL POROSITY MORE THAN ALENDRONATE IN THE COMPACT-APPEARING CORTEX AND OUTER TRANSITIONAL ZONE | 1 |
| 14 | Safety observations from denosumab long-term extension and cross-over studies in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis | 3 |
| 15 | A phase 3 study of the efficacy and safety of Denosumab in men with low bone mineral density : design of the ADAMO | 1 |
| 16 | FIVE-YEAR DENOSUMAB TREATMENT OF POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN WITH OSTEOPOROSIS: RESULTS FROM THE FIRST TWO YEARS OF THE FREEDOM TRIAL EXTENSION | 9 |
| 17 | FREEDOM TRIAL: DENOSUMAB IS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH FRACTURE HEALING COMPLICATIONS IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN WITH OSTEOPOROSIS | 2 |
| 18 | Long-term denosumab treatment of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the first year extension study of the FREEDOM trial | 2 |
| 19 | 41 | |
| 20 | 436 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.