Christopher Skovron
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Communication top 10%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Co-authors
- David BroockmanRocío TitiunikBrendan NyhanNicholas CarnesMelody Crowder‐MeyerLogan S. CaseySpencer PistonArthur Lupia
- Topics
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation (7 papers)Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (3 papers)Gender Politics and Representation (3 papers)
- Journals
- American Political Science ReviewAmerican Journal of Political ScienceBritish Journal of Political Science
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Christopher Skovron
7 papers receiving 307 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Political Science and International Relations 259
- Sociology and Political Science 135
- Gender Studies 72
- Communication 70
- Strategy and Management 60
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Skovron
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Skovron's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Skovron with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Skovron more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Skovron
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Skovron. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Skovron. The network helps show where Christopher Skovron may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher Skovron
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher Skovron. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher Skovron based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher Skovron. Christopher Skovron is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 | |
| 2 | Bias in Perceptions of Public Opinion among Political Elitesbreakdown → | 209 |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 39 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | What Politicians Believe About Their Constituents: Asymmetric Misperceptions and Prospects for Constituency Control | 19 |
About Christopher Skovron
Christopher Skovron is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Political Science and International Relations and Communication, having authored 7 papers that have together received 322 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (7 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (3 papers) and Gender Politics and Representation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (259 citations), Communication (70 citations) and Gender Studies (72 citations). Christopher Skovron has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David Broockman, Rocío Titiunik, Brendan Nyhan, Nicholas Carnes, Melody Crowder‐Meyer, Logan S. Casey, Spencer Piston, Arthur Lupia and Timothy J. Ryan. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science and British Journal of Political Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.