Christopher M. Holman

68 papers receiving 283 citations

Peers

Christopher M. Holman
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 80
  • Cancer Research 67
  • Business and International Management 7
  • Oncology 58
  • Molecular Biology 123
Replace Changchun Zhu with:
Changchun Zhu China
Masako Ueda United States
Jeff Johnson United States
Sabarni K. Chatterjee United States
Neha Tripathi India
Federica Destro Italy
Junping Yang China
Andreï Mogoutov France
Qianyi Sun China
Sang-Chul Park South Korea
Christopher M. Holman relative to Changchun Zhu China Changchun Zhu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Changchun Zhu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher M. Holman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher M. Holman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher M. Holman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher M. Holman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher M. Holman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher M. Holman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher M. Holman. The network helps show where Christopher M. Holman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Christopher M. Holman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher M. Holman Line = papers co-authored together Christopher M. Holman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 101 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199642
2 199532
3 199828
4 199422
5 201220
6
The Impact of Human Gene Patents on Innovation and Access: A Survey of Human Gene Patent Litigation
200819
7 200815
8 199511
9 20159
10 20197
11
Biotechnology's Prescription for Patent Reform
20065
12 20185
13 19894
14 20124
15 20104
16 20114
17 20184
18 20124
19 20153
20 20183

About Christopher M. Holman

Christopher M. Holman is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Physiology, Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 101 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intellectual Property and Patents (38 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (32 papers), Law, AI, and Intellectual Property (22 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (13 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (12 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (9 papers), Biotechnology and Related Fields (8 papers) and Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (80 citations), Cancer Research (67 citations), Business and International Management (7 citations), Oncology (58 citations) and Molecular Biology (123 citations). Christopher M. Holman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Singapore and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Harold E. Van Wart, William F. Benisek, Michelle F. Browner, Michael R. Gehring, Chen‐Chen Kan, Anthony Welch, Mitchell C. Brenner, Martin Huber, Andrew W. Torrance and Joshua D. Sarnoff. Their work appears in journals such as Biochemistry, Nature Biotechnology, Indiana Law Review, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics and Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact