Christopher J. Breeden
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- William HartKyle RichardsonGregory K. TortorielloThomas E. FordMark A. FergusonJennifer L. StewartPhilip A. GableEric L. Mann
- Topics
- Personality Traits and Psychology (23 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (10 papers)Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Christopher J. Breeden
29 papers receiving 264 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Clinical Psychology 166
- Social Psychology 126
- Sociology and Political Science 95
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 60
- Cognitive Neuroscience 35
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher J. Breeden
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher J. Breeden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher J. Breeden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher J. Breeden more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher J. Breeden
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher J. Breeden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher J. Breeden. The network helps show where Christopher J. Breeden may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher J. Breeden
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher J. Breeden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher J. Breeden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher J. Breeden. Christopher J. Breeden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 19 |
About Christopher J. Breeden
Christopher J. Breeden is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 270 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Personality Traits and Psychology (23 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (10 papers) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (166 citations), Social Psychology (126 citations) and Applied Psychology (30 citations). Christopher J. Breeden has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include William Hart, Kyle Richardson, Gregory K. Tortoriello, Thomas E. Ford, Mark A. Ferguson, Jennifer L. Stewart, Philip A. Gable, Eric L. Mann, Hayley V. MacDonald and Evan J. White. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Journal of Personality and Psychological Assessment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.