Christopher D. Pull
Impact in
- Insect Science top 1%
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
- Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
-
- Plant and animal studies
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Papers in
- Genetics 13
- Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior 13
-
- Insect and Pesticide Research 11
- Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences 5
- Co-authors
- Sylvia Cremer (5 shared papers)Matthias A. Fürst (1 shared paper)Mark J. F. Brown (3 shared papers)Dino P. McMahon (2 shared papers)Anna V. Grasse (2 shared papers)Robert J. Paxton (1 shared paper)Ka S. Lim (1 shared paper)Stephan Wolf (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Current Biology (2 papers)PeerJ (1 paper)Trends in Ecology & Evolution (1 paper)Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution (1 paper)Die Naturwissenschaften (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustriaGermany
In The Last Decade
Christopher D. Pull
11 papers receiving 576 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Insect Science 454
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 403
- Genetics 501
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 40
- Modeling and Simulation 6
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher D. Pull
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher D. Pull's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher D. Pull with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher D. Pull more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher D. Pull
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher D. Pull. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher D. Pull. The network helps show where Christopher D. Pull may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher D. Pull, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 192 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 102 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 85 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 48 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 43 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 40 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 25 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 13 | 2024 | 0 |
About Christopher D. Pull
Christopher D. Pull is a scholar working on Genetics, Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Sociology and Political Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 13 papers that have together received 584 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (13 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (11 papers), Plant and animal studies (8 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (5 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (1 paper) and Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (454 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (403 citations), Genetics (501 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (40 citations) and Modeling and Simulation (6 citations). Christopher D. Pull has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Austria and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Sylvia Cremer, Matthias A. Fürst, Mark J. F. Brown, Dino P. McMahon, Anna V. Grasse, Robert J. Paxton, Ka S. Lim, Stephan Wolf, Suzanne J. Clark and Juliet L. Osborne. Their work appears in journals such as Current Biology, PeerJ, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution and Die Naturwissenschaften.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.