Mark J. F. Brown
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.05%
- Insect Science top 0.02%
- Genetics top 0.1%
- Plant Science top 1%
- Ecology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Robert J. PaxtonPaul Schmid‐HempelEllouise LeadbeaterDino P. McMahonMatthias A. FürstHarry SiviterTomás E. MurrayRegula Schmid‐Hempel
- Topics
- Plant and animal studies (145 papers)Insect and Pesticide Research (124 papers)Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (106 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIrelandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mark J. F. Brown
181 papers receiving 8.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 6.7k
- Insect Science 6.2k
- Genetics 5.0k
- Plant Science 1.4k
- Ecology 627
Countries citing papers authored by Mark J. F. Brown
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark J. F. Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark J. F. Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark J. F. Brown more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark J. F. Brown
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark J. F. Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark J. F. Brown. The network helps show where Mark J. F. Brown may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark J. F. Brown
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark J. F. Brown. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark J. F. Brown based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark J. F. Brown. Mark J. F. Brown is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 91 | |
| 17 | 178 | |
| 18 | Disease risk analysis for the reintroduction of the short-haired bumblebee (Bombus subterraneus) to the UK | 2 |
| 19 | Improving Forest Operations Management through Applied Research | 5 |
| 20 | 51 |
About Mark J. F. Brown
Mark J. F. Brown is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Genetics, having authored 189 papers that have together received 8.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (145 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (124 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (106 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (6.2k citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (6.7k citations) and Genetics (5.0k citations). Mark J. F. Brown has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Paxton, Paul Schmid‐Hempel, Ellouise Leadbeater, Dino P. McMahon, Matthias A. Fürst, Harry Siviter, Tomás E. Murray, Regula Schmid‐Hempel, Úna Fitzpatrick and Juliet L. Osborne. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.