Christopher D. Karadjov
- Communication top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Strategy and Management
- Computer Networks and Communications
- Co-authors
- Zvi ReichClaudia Melladoİncilay CangözJosef SeethalerThomas HanitzschPeter G. MwesigeRosa BerganzaBasyouni Ibrahim Hamada
- Topics
- Social Media and Politics (3 papers)Media Studies and Communication (3 papers)Public Relations and Crisis Communication (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChileRomania
In The Last Decade
Christopher D. Karadjov
5 papers receiving 581 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Communication 549
- Sociology and Political Science 230
- Gender Studies 59
- Strategy and Management 41
- Computer Networks and Communications 39
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher D. Karadjov
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher D. Karadjov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher D. Karadjov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher D. Karadjov more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher D. Karadjov
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher D. Karadjov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher D. Karadjov. The network helps show where Christopher D. Karadjov may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher D. Karadjov
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher D. Karadjov. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher D. Karadjov based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher D. Karadjov. Christopher D. Karadjov is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Worlds of Journalism : Journalistic Cultures, Professional Autonomy, and Perceived Influences across 18 Nations | 5 |
| 2 | Mapping journalism cultures across nations : a comparative study of 18 countries | 22 |
| 3 | 417 | |
| 4 | 166 | |
| 5 | 17 |
About Christopher D. Karadjov
Christopher D. Karadjov is a scholar working on Communication, Social Psychology and Infectious Diseases, having authored 5 papers that have together received 627 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Media and Politics (3 papers), Media Studies and Communication (3 papers) and Public Relations and Crisis Communication (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (549 citations), Gender Studies (59 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (230 citations). Christopher D. Karadjov has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and Romania. Frequent co-authors include Zvi Reich, Claudia Mellado, İncilay Cangöz, Josef Seethaler, Thomas Hanitzsch, Peter G. Mwesige, Rosa Berganza, Basyouni Ibrahim Hamada, Dani Vardiansyah Noor and Mihaï Coman. Their work appears in journals such as Public Relations Review, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly and Journalism Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.