Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Effects of International Economic Dependence on Development and Inequality: A Cross-National Study
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Chase‐Dunn
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Chase‐Dunn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Chase‐Dunn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Chase‐Dunn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Chase‐Dunn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Chase‐Dunn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Chase‐Dunn. The network helps show where Christopher Chase‐Dunn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher Chase‐Dunn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher Chase‐Dunn.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher Chase‐Dunn based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher Chase‐Dunn. Christopher Chase‐Dunn is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wallerstein, Immanuel, Christopher Chase‐Dunn, & Christian Suter. (2015). Overcoming Global Inequalities.33 indexed citations
6.
Smith, Jackie, Marina Karides, Marc Becker, et al.. (2014). Global democracy and the World Social Forum. Second edition. Cadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute).1 indexed citations
Chase‐Dunn, Christopher, et al.. (2010). Middlemen and Marcher States in Central Asia and East/West Empire Synchrony. Social Evolution & History. 9(1).4 indexed citations
9.
Chase‐Dunn, Christopher. (2010). Globalization from below: toward a democratic global commonwealth. Journal of Globalization Studies. 1(1).5 indexed citations
Friedman, Jonathan & Christopher Chase‐Dunn. (2005). Hegemonic Declines: Past and Present. Lund University Publications (Lund University).8 indexed citations
12.
Chase‐Dunn, Christopher. (2000). Guatemala in the Global System. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs. 42(4). 109–126.8 indexed citations
Chase‐Dunn, Christopher. (1995). The institutionalized cabinet : governing the Western Provinces. McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks.5 indexed citations
16.
Chase‐Dunn, Christopher, et al.. (1994). Cities in the Central Political/Military Network Since CE 1200: Size Hierarchy and Domination. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 30(30). 13.6 indexed citations
Chase‐Dunn, Christopher. (1988). Comparing World Systems: Toward a Theory of Semipheral Development. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 19(19). 3.8 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.