Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Cultural Citizenship as Subject-Making: Immigrants Negotiate Racial and Cultural Boundaries in the United States [and Comments and Reply]
1996507 citationsJonathan Friedman et al.Current Anthropologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Friedman
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Friedman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Friedman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Friedman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Friedman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Friedman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Friedman. The network helps show where Jonathan Friedman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jonathan Friedman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jonathan Friedman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jonathan Friedman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jonathan Friedman. Jonathan Friedman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Friedman, Jonathan, et al.. (2008). Modernities, Class, and the Contradictions of Globalization. Lund University Publications (Lund University).5 indexed citations
5.
Friedman, Jonathan. (2006). Sustainable unsustainability: Toward a comparative study of hegemonic decline in global systems. Lund University Publications (Lund University).5 indexed citations
6.
James, Paul & Jonathan Friedman. (2006). Globalizing war and intervention. Sage eBooks.
7.
Friedman, Jonathan & Christopher Chase‐Dunn. (2005). Hegemonic Declines: Past and Present. Lund University Publications (Lund University).8 indexed citations
8.
Friedman, Jonathan. (2005). Comments on Reyna. Focaal. 2005(45). 152–157.
Friedman, Jonathan. (2003). The paradoxes of real existing globalization: elite discourses and the grassroots. Lund University Publications (Lund University).2 indexed citations
13.
Friedman, Jonathan. (2002). Globalization, dis-integration, re-organization: the transformations of violence. Lund University Publications (Lund University).14 indexed citations
14.
Friedman, Jonathan. (2002). From nine-eleven to seven-eleven: The poverty of interpretation. Anthropological Quarterly. 46(1). 104–109.1 indexed citations
15.
Althabe, Gérard, Marc Augé, Jean Bazin, et al.. (2002). Anthropologie des mondes contemporains. OpenEdition (OpenEdition). 426.1 indexed citations
Friedman, Jonathan. (1999). Rhinoceros2. Current Anthropology. 40(5). 679–694.
19.
Friedman, Jonathan. (1992). Nicholas Thomas, Out of Time: History and Evolution in Anthropological Discourse. Pacific studies. 15(2). 109–118.1 indexed citations
20.
Friedman, Jonathan & Marshall Sahlins. (1987). Islands of History.. History and Theory. 26(1). 72–72.21 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.