Christopher Bovis
Impact in
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Public Procurement and Policy
- Public-Private Partnership Projects
- Regulation and Compliance Studies
- Law top 5%
- EU Law and Policy Analysis
- Legal Issues in South Africa
Papers in
-
- Public Procurement and Policy 29
- Public-Private Partnership Projects 9
- Law 24
- EU Law and Policy Analysis 16
- Legal Issues in South Africa 6
- European and International Contract Law 5
Christopher Bovis
31 papers receiving 174 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Strategy and Management 146
- Law 49
- Management Information Systems 27
- Political Science and International Relations 46
- Management Science and Operations Research 22
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Bovis
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Bovis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Bovis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Bovis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Bovis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Bovis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Bovis. The network helps show where Christopher Bovis may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 2 scholars most cited alongside Christopher Bovis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1998 | 21 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 17 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 12 | |
| 6 | EC public procurement law | 1997 | 11 |
| 7 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2002 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 19 | The law of EU public procurement | 2015 | 4 |
| 20 | 1997 | 4 |
About Christopher Bovis
Christopher Bovis is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Law, Political Science and International Relations, Accounting and Finance, having authored 41 papers that have together received 202 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Public Procurement and Policy (29 papers), EU Law and Policy Analysis (16 papers), Public-Private Partnership Projects (9 papers), Legal Issues in South Africa (6 papers), European and International Contract Law (5 papers), Polish Law and Legal System (4 papers), Taxation and Legal Issues (3 papers) and Intellectual Property Rights and Media (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (146 citations), Law (49 citations), Management Information Systems (27 citations), Political Science and International Relations (46 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (22 citations). Christopher Bovis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Vietnam and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Charles Clarke and David Grant. Their work appears in journals such as ERA Forum, Common Market Law Review, European Law Journal, European Journal of Risk Regulation and International Journal of Public Sector Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.