Common Market Law Review

2.6k papers and 9.9k indexed citations
i
.

About

The 2.6k papers published in Common Market Law Review in the last decades have received a total of 9.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Common Market Law Review usually cover Political Science and International Relations (1.3k papers), Law (1.0k papers) and Accounting (800 papers) specifically the topics of European and International Law Studies (910 papers), Taxation and Legal Issues (752 papers) and EU Law and Policy Analysis (544 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Common Market Law Review are Deirdre Curtin, Armin von Bogdandy, Koen Lenaerts, Michael Dougan, Niamh Nic Shuibhne, Ingolf Pernice, Edoardo Chiti, Vassilis Hatzopoulos, Niamh Moloney and Charlotte O’Brien.

In The Last Decade

Common Market Law Review

1.3k papers receiving 5.5k citations

Fields of papers published in Common Market Law Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Common Market Law Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Common Market Law Review.

Countries where authors publish in Common Market Law Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Common Market Law Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Common Market Law Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Common Market Law Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026