Christoph Gille
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Neurology top 10%
- Physiology
- Epidemiology
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Co-authors
- Cornelius FrömmelHermann−Georg HolzhütterSabrina HoffmannAndreas HoppeRobert PreißnerPeter NürnbergKristian RotherAndrean Goede
- Topics
- Protein Structure and Dynamics (9 papers)Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (9 papers)Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (8 papers)
- Journals
- Nucleic Acids ResearchSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBioinformatics
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Christoph Gille
42 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Molecular Biology 937
- Neurology 194
- Physiology 148
- Epidemiology 141
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 122
Countries citing papers authored by Christoph Gille
This map shows the geographic impact of Christoph Gille's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christoph Gille with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christoph Gille more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christoph Gille
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christoph Gille. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christoph Gille. The network helps show where Christoph Gille may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christoph Gille
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christoph Gille. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christoph Gille based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christoph Gille. Christoph Gille is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19 | |
| 2 | Die Neue Rechte in der Sozialen Arbeit in NRW: Exemplarische Analysen | 2 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 129 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 46 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 120 | |
| 18 | 231 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Christoph Gille
Christoph Gille is a scholar working on Complementary and Manual Therapy, Molecular Biology and Public Administration, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Protein Structure and Dynamics (9 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (9 papers) and Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (937 citations), Neurology (194 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (19 citations). Christoph Gille has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Cornelius Frömmel, Hermann−Georg Holzhütter, Sabrina Hoffmann, Andreas Hoppe, Robert Preißner, Peter Nürnberg, Kristian Rother, Andrean Goede, Sven Hoffmeyer and Andreas Gewies. Their work appears in journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Bioinformatics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.