Christina Bergh

2.1k total citations
7 papers, 53 citations indexed

About

Christina Bergh is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Obstetrics and Gynecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Christina Bergh has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 53 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 4 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 2 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Recurrent topics in Christina Bergh's work include Ovarian function and disorders (3 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (3 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (3 papers). Christina Bergh is often cited by papers focused on Ovarian function and disorders (3 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (3 papers) and Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (3 papers). Christina Bergh collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Denmark and Norway. Christina Bergh's co-authors include Ulla‐Britt Wennerholm, Anja Pinborg, Kersti Lundin, Debbie A. Lawlor, Annika Strandell, Mika Gissler, Abigail Fraser, Lars Nilsson, Liv Bente Romundstad and Bjørn Olav Åsvold and has published in prestigious journals such as BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica and Reproductive BioMedicine Online.

In The Last Decade

Christina Bergh

7 papers receiving 52 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Christina Bergh Sweden 4 37 26 17 17 4 7 53
S Andrijasevic Serbia 5 18 0.5× 26 1.0× 26 1.5× 11 0.6× 1 0.3× 6 46
Jaap M Schierbeek Netherlands 3 21 0.6× 30 1.2× 6 0.4× 14 0.8× 1 0.3× 6 49
Haiyan Bai China 4 18 0.5× 12 0.5× 4 0.2× 16 0.9× 8 24
Denis Gallot France 2 13 0.4× 6 0.2× 15 0.9× 12 0.7× 1 0.3× 3 19
T. Manolitsas Australia 2 67 1.8× 12 0.5× 67 3.9× 9 0.5× 11 2.8× 2 86
Habiba Sharaf Ali Pakistan 4 8 0.2× 21 0.8× 10 0.6× 10 0.6× 10 44
Juana Hernández Spain 4 21 0.6× 29 1.1× 2 0.1× 15 0.9× 12 34
R. Raphael Israel 2 16 0.4× 15 0.6× 3 0.2× 5 0.3× 3 32
Russel J. Thomsen United States 4 19 0.5× 5 0.2× 9 0.5× 19 1.1× 2 0.5× 5 33
Anastasia Nyman Sweden 3 12 0.3× 9 0.3× 10 0.6× 7 0.4× 32 8.0× 3 56

Countries citing papers authored by Christina Bergh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christina Bergh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christina Bergh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christina Bergh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christina Bergh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christina Bergh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christina Bergh. The network helps show where Christina Bergh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christina Bergh

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christina Bergh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christina Bergh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christina Bergh. Christina Bergh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Hanevik, Hans Ivar, Christina Bergh, Hannele Laivuori, et al.. (2024). Limiting access to assisted reproductive technologies for males of advanced age—Pros and cons from a Nordic perspective. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 103(11). 2124–2129. 1 indexed citations
2.
Forman, Julie Lyng, Anne Zedeler, Jeanette Bogstad, et al.. (2024). The prevalence of late-follicular phase progesterone elevation and impact on the ongoing pregnancy rate after fresh and frozen blastocyst transfer. Sub-study of an RCT. Human Fertility. 27(1). 2265153–2265153. 1 indexed citations
3.
Magnus, Maria C., Abigail Fraser, Siri E. Håberg, et al.. (2023). Maternal Risk of Cardiovascular Disease After Use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies. JAMA Cardiology. 8(9). 837–837. 21 indexed citations
4.
Magnusson, Åsa, Hans Ivar Hanevik, Hannele Laivuori, et al.. (2023). Endometrial preparation protocols prior to frozen embryo transfer – convenience or safety?. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 48(1). 103587–103587. 8 indexed citations
5.
Wennerholm, Ulla‐Britt, Erica Ginström Ernstad, & Christina Bergh. (2022). [Health and risk among children conceived after IVF and their mothers].. PubMed. 119. 1 indexed citations
6.
Wennerholm, Ulla‐Britt, Sissel Saltvedt, Christina Bergh, et al.. (2021). Induction of labour at 41 weeks of gestation versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks of gestation: A cost‐effectiveness analysis. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 129(13). 2157–2165. 11 indexed citations
7.
Strandell, Annika, et al.. (2003). Fallopian tube sperm perfusion: the impact of sperm count and morphology on pregnancy rates. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 82(11). 1023–1029. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026