Annika Strandell

5.7k total citations
91 papers, 3.2k citations indexed

About

Annika Strandell is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Annika Strandell has authored 91 papers receiving a total of 3.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 42 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 40 papers in Reproductive Medicine and 28 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Annika Strandell's work include Gynecological conditions and treatments (27 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (20 papers) and Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (18 papers). Annika Strandell is often cited by papers focused on Gynecological conditions and treatments (27 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (20 papers) and Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management (18 papers). Annika Strandell collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, United States and Netherlands. Annika Strandell's co-authors include Jane Thorburn, Christina Bergh, Lars Hamberger, Ulla Waldenström, Anja Pinborg, Jon Hausken, Barbara Jablonowska, Anette Lindhard, Ben W. Mol and Torbjörn Hillensjø and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Annika Strandell

86 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Annika Strandell Sweden 29 1.6k 1.2k 1.1k 1.1k 404 91 3.2k
T. Van den Bosch Belgium 28 1.6k 1.1× 2.4k 2.0× 812 0.7× 807 0.7× 235 0.6× 127 3.5k
Vyta Senikas Canada 31 1.1k 0.7× 1.2k 1.0× 1.3k 1.1× 1.3k 1.2× 351 0.9× 87 3.7k
Eray Çalışkan Türkiye 24 731 0.5× 775 0.6× 657 0.6× 890 0.8× 299 0.7× 130 2.1k
G. Condous Australia 37 2.3k 1.5× 2.3k 1.9× 1.7k 1.5× 2.6k 2.4× 460 1.1× 280 5.2k
A Perino Italy 34 1.5k 1.0× 1.5k 1.3× 417 0.4× 734 0.7× 722 1.8× 139 3.5k
Stephen L. Corson United States 32 1.5k 1.0× 1.1k 0.9× 664 0.6× 876 0.8× 471 1.2× 159 3.3k
Aris Antsaklis Greece 33 500 0.3× 1.7k 1.4× 2.1k 1.9× 1.1k 1.0× 683 1.7× 208 4.2k
L. Regan United Kingdom 40 1.2k 0.8× 3.6k 3.0× 1.8k 1.6× 2.0k 1.8× 740 1.8× 70 7.5k
Apostolos Athanasiadis Greece 25 205 0.1× 1.0k 0.9× 1.0k 0.9× 693 0.6× 362 0.9× 162 2.3k
Arnaud Fauconnier France 40 3.9k 2.5× 3.5k 2.9× 304 0.3× 1.0k 0.9× 1.9k 4.8× 240 6.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Annika Strandell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annika Strandell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annika Strandell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annika Strandell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annika Strandell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annika Strandell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annika Strandell. The network helps show where Annika Strandell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annika Strandell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annika Strandell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annika Strandell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annika Strandell. Annika Strandell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Liv, Per, et al.. (2024). Complications after benign gynecologic surgery—How are they captured in register‐based research? A national register study in Sweden. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 103(11). 2221–2231. 1 indexed citations
3.
Idahl, Annika, et al.. (2023). SALpingectomy for STERilisation (SALSTER): study protocol for a Swedish multicentre register-based randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 13(9). e071246–e071246. 3 indexed citations
4.
Wennerholm, Ulla‐Britt, Lina Bergman, Max Petzold, et al.. (2023). Progesterone, cerclage, pessary, or acetylsalicylic acid for prevention of preterm birth in singleton and multifetal pregnancies – A systematic review and meta-analyses. Frontiers in Medicine. 10. 1111315–1111315. 10 indexed citations
5.
Bolmsjö, Beata Borgström, Sophia Frantz, Christine Rubertsson, et al.. (2023). Child and maternal benefits and risks of caseload midwifery – a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 23(1). 663–663. 2 indexed citations
7.
Bergh, Christina, Mats Brännström, Ali Khatibi, et al.. (2022). Vaginal progesterone as luteal phase support in natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer (ProFET): protocol for a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 12(7). e062400–e062400. 2 indexed citations
8.
Bergh, Christina, et al.. (2022). Pregnancy of unknown location: external validation of the hCG-based M6NP and M4 prediction models in an emergency gynaecology unit. BMJ Open. 12(11). e058454–e058454. 7 indexed citations
9.
Kristjánsdóttir, Björg, et al.. (2021). Risk of epithelial ovarian cancer Type I and II after hysterectomy, salpingectomy and tubal ligation—A nationwide case‐control study. International Journal of Cancer. 149(8). 1544–1552. 17 indexed citations
10.
Nüssler, Emil, et al.. (2017). Patient-reported outcomes after sacrospinous fixation of vault prolapse with a suturing device: a retrospective national cohort study. International Urogynecology Journal. 29(6). 821–829. 9 indexed citations
11.
Bergh, Christina, et al.. (2016). Classification of pregnancies of unknown location according to four different hCG-based protocols. Human Reproduction. 31(10). 2203–2211. 11 indexed citations
12.
Strandell, Annika. (2007). Treatment of hydrosalpinx in the patient undergoing assisted reproduction. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 19(4). 360–365. 18 indexed citations
13.
Hausken, Jon, Torbjörn Hillensjø, Barbara Jablonowska, et al.. (2004). Elective Single-Embryo Transfer versus Double-Embryo Transfer in in Vitro Fertilization. New England Journal of Medicine. 351(23). 2392–2402. 424 indexed citations
14.
Strandell, Annika, et al.. (2003). Fallopian tube sperm perfusion: the impact of sperm count and morphology on pregnancy rates. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 82(11). 1023–1029. 10 indexed citations
15.
Strandell, Annika. (2002). Why does hydrosalpinx reduce fertility?: The importance of hydrosalpinx fluid. Human Reproduction. 17(5). 1141–1145. 89 indexed citations
16.
Strandell, Annika, Anette Lindhard, Ulla Waldenström, & Jane Thorburn. (2001). Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: cumulative results after salpingectomy in a randomized controlled trial*. Human Reproduction. 16(11). 2403–2410. 95 indexed citations
18.
Strandell, Annika, Christina Bergh, & Kersti Lundin. (2000). Selection of patients suitable for one-embryo transfer may reduce the rate of multiple births by half without impairment of overall birth rates. Human Reproduction. 15(12). 2520–2525. 107 indexed citations
19.
Gray, Daniel T., et al.. (1995). A cost-effectiveness study of a randomised trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy. The Lancet. 345(8958). 1139–1143. 86 indexed citations
20.
Christenson, B, et al.. (1989). Immunity and immunization of children against diphtheria in Sweden. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases. 8(3). 214–219. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026