Helen Elden

1.6k total citations
57 papers, 989 citations indexed

About

Helen Elden is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Helen Elden has authored 57 papers receiving a total of 989 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 20 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 15 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Helen Elden's work include Pregnancy-related medical research (20 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (16 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (13 papers). Helen Elden is often cited by papers focused on Pregnancy-related medical research (20 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (16 papers) and Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (13 papers). Helen Elden collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Italy and Norway. Helen Elden's co-authors include Henrik Hagberg, Lars Ladfors, Monika Fagevik Olsén, Monika Fagevik-Olsén, Ingela Lundgren, Annelie Gutke, Eva Robertson, Gunilla Kjellby-Wendt, Verena Sengpiel and Elisabet Stener‐Victorin and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, BMJ and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

In The Last Decade

Helen Elden

53 papers receiving 948 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Helen Elden Sweden 16 627 305 262 243 219 57 989
Francesca Wuytack Ireland 13 217 0.3× 92 0.3× 131 0.5× 73 0.3× 86 0.4× 31 475
Katrine Mari Owe Norway 16 752 1.2× 761 2.5× 127 0.5× 307 1.3× 28 0.1× 28 1.1k
Audrey A.A. Fiddelers Netherlands 15 186 0.3× 28 0.1× 305 1.2× 363 1.5× 47 0.2× 29 817
Janette Gale Australia 11 255 0.4× 247 0.8× 175 0.7× 63 0.3× 101 0.5× 15 648
Simon Gates United Kingdom 6 82 0.1× 165 0.5× 99 0.4× 140 0.6× 106 0.5× 13 458
Brenda A. Bucklin United States 11 156 0.2× 183 0.6× 382 1.5× 133 0.5× 10 0.0× 29 736
Catherine McParlin United Kingdom 13 418 0.7× 336 1.1× 125 0.5× 141 0.6× 9 0.0× 23 608
Margaret Hux Canada 11 156 0.2× 30 0.1× 54 0.2× 53 0.2× 52 0.2× 16 551
Meg Carley Canada 17 269 0.4× 9 0.0× 300 1.1× 110 0.5× 121 0.6× 55 846

Countries citing papers authored by Helen Elden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Elden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Elden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Elden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Elden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Elden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Elden. The network helps show where Helen Elden may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helen Elden

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helen Elden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helen Elden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helen Elden. Helen Elden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Cumber, Samuel Nambile, Anna Williams, Helen Elden, & Malin Bogren. (2024). Fathers’ involvement in pregnancy and childbirth in Africa: an integrative systematic review. Global Health Action. 17(1). 2372906–2372906. 4 indexed citations
3.
4.
5.
Holter, Herborg, et al.. (2023). Barriers to using postpartum family planning among women in Zanzibar, Tanzania. BMC Women s Health. 23(1). 182–182. 5 indexed citations
6.
Lindén, Karolina, et al.. (2023). The experience of being a partner to a childbearing woman whose pregnancy is complicated by pre-eclampsia: A Swedish qualitative study. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare. 36. 100847–100847. 1 indexed citations
7.
Mollberg, Margareta, et al.. (2022). Increased incidence of shoulder dystocia but a declining incidence of obstetric brachial plexus palsy in vaginally delivered infants. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 102(1). 76–81. 6 indexed citations
8.
Lundgren, Ingela, et al.. (2022). Women’s lived experiences of induction of labour in late- and post-term pregnancy within the Swedish post-term induction study – a phenomenological study. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being. 17(1). 2056958–2056958. 3 indexed citations
9.
Cumber, Samuel Nambile, et al.. (2022). Barriers and strategies needed to improve maternal health services among pregnant adolescents in Uganda: a qualitative study. Global Health Action. 15(1). 2067397–2067397. 16 indexed citations
10.
Miani, Céline, et al.. (2022). Individual and country-level variables associated with the medicalization of birth. European Journal of Public Health. 32(Supplement_3). 2 indexed citations
11.
Lazzerini, Marzia, Raquel Costa, Ilaria Mariani, et al.. (2022). Science and beyond science in the reporting of quality of facility-based maternal and newborn care during the COVID-19 pandemic—Authors’ reply. The Lancet Regional Health - Europe. 20. 100488–100488. 1 indexed citations
12.
Andersson, Malin, Ove Karlsson, Sven‐Egron Thörn, et al.. (2021). Study protocol: establishment of a multicentre pre-eclampsia database and biobank in Sweden: GO PROVE and UP MOST, a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 11(11). e049559–e049559. 3 indexed citations
13.
Naurin, Elin, Dietlind Stolle, K. Martinsson, et al.. (2020). Pregnant under the pressure of a pandemic: a large-scale longitudinal survey before and during the COVID-19 outbreak. European Journal of Public Health. 31(1). 7–13. 45 indexed citations
14.
Wennerholm, Ulla‐Britt, Sissel Saltvedt, Christina Bergh, et al.. (2020). Induction of Labour at 41 Weeks Versus Expectant Management and Induction of Labour at 42 Weeks (SWEdish Post-Term Induction Study, SWEPIS): Multicentre, Open Label, Randomised, Superiority Trial. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 75(4). 207–209. 5 indexed citations
15.
Fatahi, Nabi, et al.. (2020). <p>Non-Medical Radiography Staff Experiences in Inter-Professional Communication: A Swedish Qualitative Focus Group Interview Study</p>. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare. Volume 13. 393–401. 6 indexed citations
16.
17.
Olsén, Monika Fagevik, Helen Elden, & Annelie Gutke. (2014). Evaluation of self-administered tests for pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 15(1). 138–138. 10 indexed citations
18.
Olsén, Monika Fagevik, et al.. (2007). A comparison of high‐ versus low‐intensity, high‐frequency transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation for painful postpartum uterine contractions. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 86(3). 310–314. 29 indexed citations
19.
Candan, Ferhan, et al.. (2005). Simultaneous bilateral trochanteric fractures during squatting in a patient with multiple myeloma. European Journal of Cancer Care. 14(2). 185–187. 4 indexed citations
20.
Ladfors, Lars, et al.. (2004). Effects of acupuncture and specific stabilizing exercises among women with pregnancy-related pelvic pain: A randomised single blind controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 191(6). S77–S77. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Francesca Wuytack Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Katrine Mari Owe Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Audrey A.A. Fiddelers Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Janette Gale Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Simon Gates Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Brenda A. Bucklin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Catherine McParlin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Margaret Hux Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Meg Carley
Rankless by CCL
2026