Christian Dohna‐Schwake
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Surgery
- Genetics top 10%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Uwe MelliesThomas VoïtFlorian StehlingEva TschiedelUrsula Felderhoff‐MüserHelmut TeschlerR. RagetteNora Bruns
- Topics
- Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (14 papers)Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (13 papers)Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Christian Dohna‐Schwake
75 papers receiving 939 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 336
- Epidemiology 168
- Surgery 152
- Genetics 135
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 132
Countries citing papers authored by Christian Dohna‐Schwake
This map shows the geographic impact of Christian Dohna‐Schwake's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christian Dohna‐Schwake with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christian Dohna‐Schwake more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christian Dohna‐Schwake
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christian Dohna‐Schwake. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christian Dohna‐Schwake. The network helps show where Christian Dohna‐Schwake may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christian Dohna‐Schwake
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christian Dohna‐Schwake. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christian Dohna‐Schwake based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christian Dohna‐Schwake. Christian Dohna‐Schwake is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 57 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 88 |
About Christian Dohna‐Schwake
Christian Dohna‐Schwake is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Neurology and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 94 papers that have together received 965 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (14 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (13 papers) and Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (72 citations), Genetics (135 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (84 citations). Christian Dohna‐Schwake has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Uwe Mellies, Thomas Voït, Florian Stehling, Eva Tschiedel, Ursula Felderhoff‐Müser, Helmut Teschler, R. Ragette, Nora Bruns, Michael Wallot and Thomas Voit. Their work appears in journals such as Stroke, Scientific Reports and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.