Chok‐Fun Chui
Impact in
- Plant Science top 5%
- Weed Control and Herbicide Applications
- Genetically Modified Organisms Research
- Plant Virus Research Studies
- Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
- Biotechnology top 10%
- Transgenic Plants and Applications
Papers in
-
- Insect Resistance and Genetics 2
- Plant tissue culture and regeneration 2
- Plant Gene Expression Analysis 1
- Protist diversity and phylogeny 1
-
- Genetically Modified Organisms Research 1
- Soybean genetics and cultivation 1
- Co-authors
- Barbara J. Mazur (3 shared papers)Julie K. Smith (1 shared paper)John Bedbrook (1 shared paper)Pamela Dunsmuir (1 shared paper)Margaret E. Black (1 shared paper)James M. Tepperman (1 shared paper)Jeffrey Townsend (1 shared paper)S. Carl Falco (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- PLANT PHYSIOLOGY (2 papers)Crop Science (1 paper)The EMBO Journal (1 paper)Food and Chemical Toxicology (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Chok‐Fun Chui
6 papers receiving 496 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Plant Science 381
- Biotechnology 64
- Molecular Biology 380
- Pollution 43
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 42
Countries citing papers authored by Chok‐Fun Chui
This map shows the geographic impact of Chok‐Fun Chui's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chok‐Fun Chui with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chok‐Fun Chui more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chok‐Fun Chui
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chok‐Fun Chui. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chok‐Fun Chui. The network helps show where Chok‐Fun Chui may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chok‐Fun Chui, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1988 | 203 | |
| 2 | 1987 | 169 | |
| 3 | 1982 | 60 | |
| 4 | 2007 | 58 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 14 |
About Chok‐Fun Chui
Chok‐Fun Chui is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Pollution, Biochemistry and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, having authored 6 papers that have together received 530 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Resistance and Genetics (2 papers), Plant tissue culture and regeneration (2 papers), Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (1 paper), Metalloenzymes and iron-sulfur proteins (1 paper), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (1 paper), Plant Gene Expression Analysis (1 paper), Protist diversity and phylogeny (1 paper) and Soybean genetics and cultivation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (381 citations), Biotechnology (64 citations), Molecular Biology (380 citations), Pollution (43 citations) and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (42 citations). Chok‐Fun Chui has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Barbara J. Mazur, Julie K. Smith, John Bedbrook, Pamela Dunsmuir, Margaret E. Black, James M. Tepperman, Jeffrey Townsend, S. Carl Falco, Julia Reynolds and Ian Lamb. Their work appears in journals such as PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, Crop Science, The EMBO Journal, Food and Chemical Toxicology and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.