Chloé Bourguignon

510 citations
27 papers · 321 indexed · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Chloé Bourguignon

27 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers

Chloé Bourguignon
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Molecular Medicine 17
  • Nephrology 23
  • Internal Medicine 11
  • Molecular Biology 176
  • Aging 4
Replace Yanlan Yu with:
Yanlan Yu China
Xian Yu China
Erdem Dinç Türkiye
Sanaz Abbaspour‐Aghdam Iran
Eric Scott United States
Yoshihiro Taniguchi Japan
Anna Lundell Sweden
Valéry Daubie Belgium
Maja Buszko United States
Krystal J. Vail United States
Chloé Bourguignon relative to Yanlan Yu China Yanlan Yu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Yanlan Yu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chloé Bourguignon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chloé Bourguignon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chloé Bourguignon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chloé Bourguignon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chloé Bourguignon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chloé Bourguignon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chloé Bourguignon. The network helps show where Chloé Bourguignon may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chloé Bourguignon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chloé Bourguignon Line = papers co-authored together Chloé Bourguignon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202066
2 199536
3 198630
4 199423
5 202122
6 201418
7 201517
8 201815
9 202213
10 20089
11 20229
12 20188
13 20208
14 20157
15 20226
16 20235
17 20214
18 20204
19 20234
20 20224

About Chloé Bourguignon

Chloé Bourguignon is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery, Internal Medicine and Hematology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 321 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (7 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (6 papers), Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (5 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (3 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (2 papers) and Platelet Disorders and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (17 citations), Nephrology (23 citations), Internal Medicine (11 citations), Molecular Biology (176 citations) and Aging (4 citations). Chloé Bourguignon has collaborated with scholars based in France, Russia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Saïd Assou, John De Vos, Joffrey Mianné, Arnaud Bourdin, Engi Ahmed, Isabelle Vachier, Lucia Sobrin, Lilly Bourguignon, Naoko Iida and Jean‐Paul Cristol. Their work appears in journals such as Stem Cell Research, Thrombosis Research, Cells, Journal of Nephrology and BMC Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact