Chizhu Ding

589 citations
21 papers · 451 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Chizhu Ding

21 papers receiving 446 citations

Peers

Chizhu Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Biomaterials 143
  • Pharmaceutical Science 54
  • Molecular Medicine 30
  • Drug Discovery 1
  • Biomedical Engineering 176
Replace Da Zou with:
Da Zou Australia
Najmeh Sadat Hosseini Motlagh Iran
Robin Capomaccio Italy
Anandhi Upendran United States
Norbert Windhab Germany
Thierry F. Vandamme France
Scott R. Rudge United States
Lindomar J. C. Albuquerque Brazil
Saeed Siavashy Iran
Chizhu Ding relative to Da Zou Australia Da Zou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Da Zou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chizhu Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chizhu Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chizhu Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chizhu Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chizhu Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chizhu Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chizhu Ding. The network helps show where Chizhu Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chizhu Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chizhu Ding Line = papers co-authored together Chizhu Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017200
2 202056
3 201839
4 201736
5 202429
6 201613
7 202012
8 201911
9 201510
10 20229
11 20229
12 20166
13 20144
14 20243
15 20252
16 20152
17 20222
18 20172
19 20242
20 20132

About Chizhu Ding

Chizhu Ding is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Analytical Chemistry and Molecular Biology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 451 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (4 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (4 papers), Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (3 papers), Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (3 papers), Biosensors and Analytical Detection (3 papers), Digital Holography and Microscopy (3 papers), Optical Coherence Tomography Applications (3 papers) and Covalent Organic Framework Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (143 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (54 citations), Molecular Medicine (30 citations), Drug Discovery (1 citation) and Biomedical Engineering (176 citations). Chizhu Ding has collaborated with scholars based in China and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Zibiao Li, Xianghua Yan, Xiang Chen, Xianchao Sun, Ailing Fu, Chen Fu, Lu Jiang, Benhui Hu, Yun‐Long Wu and Dekang Huang. Their work appears in journals such as Materials Science and Engineering C, Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, European Food Research and Technology and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact