Ching‐Kuo Lee
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis 8
- Fungal Biology and Applications 7
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities 9
- Biotechnology top 2%
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities 9
-
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 26
- Biological Activity of Diterpenoids and Biflavonoids 13
- Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis 10
- Bioactive natural compounds 7
-
- Phytochemistry and Biological Activities 21
- Co-authors
- Yueh‐Hsiung KuoTzong‐Huei LeeJim‐Min FangPei‐Wen HsiaoNing-Sun YangPo‐Huang LiangJia-Tsrong JanChih‐Jung Kuo
- Partner nations
- TaiwanUnited StatesVietnam
In The Last Decade
Ching‐Kuo Lee
91 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Pharmacology 330
- Biochemistry 180
- Complementary and alternative medicine 244
- Biotechnology 211
- Biochemistry 143
Countries citing papers authored by Ching‐Kuo Lee
This map shows the geographic impact of Ching‐Kuo Lee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ching‐Kuo Lee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ching‐Kuo Lee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ching‐Kuo Lee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ching‐Kuo Lee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ching‐Kuo Lee. The network helps show where Ching‐Kuo Lee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ching‐Kuo Lee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 20 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 32 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 18 |
About Ching‐Kuo Lee
Ching‐Kuo Lee is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Biotechnology and Pharmacology, having authored 96 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (26 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (21 papers), Biological Activity of Diterpenoids and Biflavonoids (13 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (10 papers), Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (9 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (8 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (7 papers) and Bioactive natural compounds (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (330 citations), Biochemistry (180 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (244 citations). Ching‐Kuo Lee has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Yueh‐Hsiung Kuo, Tzong‐Huei Lee, Jim‐Min Fang, Pei‐Wen Hsiao, Ning-Sun Yang, Po‐Huang Liang, Jia-Tsrong Jan, Chih‐Jung Kuo, Shang‐Tzen Chang and Shoei‐Sheng Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Molecules, Journal of Natural Products, Phytochemistry, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin and Planta Medica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.