Chienting Lin

477 total citations
21 papers, 311 citations indexed

About

Chienting Lin is a scholar working on Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science and Information Systems and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Chienting Lin has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 311 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Information Systems, 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 5 papers in Information Systems and Management. Recurrent topics in Chienting Lin's work include Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (5 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (3 papers) and Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (3 papers). Chienting Lin is often cited by papers focused on Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (5 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (3 papers) and Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (3 papers). Chienting Lin collaborates with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and Taiwan. Chienting Lin's co-authors include Hsinchun Chen, Paul Jen‐Hwa Hu, Hsinchun Chen, Jay F. Nunamaker, Tobun D. Ng, Bruce R. Schatz, Li‐Chiou Chen, Lixin Tao, Li‐An Ho and Tsung‐Hsien Kuo and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Journal of Management Information Systems and Decision Support Systems.

In The Last Decade

Chienting Lin

20 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Chienting Lin United States	10	116	84	76	66	42	21	311
Jeremy Goecks United States	7	130 1.1×	71 0.8×	44 0.6×	79 1.2×	30 0.7×	7	289
James Blustein Canada	11	127 1.1×	160 1.9×	64 0.8×	71 1.1×	55 1.3×	39	329
Carol A. Hert United States	9	192 1.7×	96 1.1×	47 0.6×	76 1.2×	32 0.8×	36	370
Manolis Tzagarakis Greece	11	81 0.7×	79 0.9×	41 0.5×	75 1.1×	37 0.9×	47	272
Nathaniel S. Borenstein United States	11	141 1.2×	112 1.3×	64 0.8×	65 1.0×	32 0.8×	29	373
Alexander Pons United States	11	127 1.1×	68 0.8×	99 1.3×	78 1.2×	33 0.8×	35	380
Robin R. Sewell United States	8	253 2.2×	188 2.2×	42 0.6×	61 0.9×	89 2.1×	19	451
Gregory H. Leazer United States	12	197 1.7×	111 1.3×	78 1.0×	37 0.6×	27 0.6×	31	412
Mark B. Schmidt United States	9	137 1.2×	50 0.6×	53 0.7×	79 1.2×	17 0.4×	36	298
Ting Lie Taiwan	8	58 0.5×	56 0.7×	49 0.6×	78 1.2×	29 0.7×	12	312

Countries citing papers authored by Chienting Lin

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chienting Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chienting Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chienting Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chienting Lin

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chienting Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chienting Lin. The network helps show where Chienting Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chienting Lin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chienting Lin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chienting Lin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chienting Lin. Chienting Lin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Bi, Henry H., et al.. (2010). Process-Driven Collaboration Support for Intra-Agency Crime Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

Kuo, Tsung‐Hsien, et al.. (2010). The factors influencing employees' attitudes in high‐tech environment. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 110(7). 1054–1072. 15 indexed citations

Tao, Lixin, Li‐Chiou Chen, & Chienting Lin. (2010). Improving Web Security Education with Virtual Labs and Shared Course Modules. 3 indexed citations

Tao, Lixin, Li‐Chiou Chen, & Chienting Lin. (2010). Virtual Open-Source Labs for Web Security Education. 8 indexed citations

Tao, Lixin, Li‐Chiou Chen, & Chienting Lin. (2010). Work in progress — Improving web security education with virtual labs and shared course modules. F2F–1. 4 indexed citations

Chen, Li‐Chiou & Chienting Lin. (2007). Combining Theory with Practice in Information Security Education. 10 indexed citations

Lin, Chin‐Yen, et al.. (2007). Practice makes better? A study of meditation learners in a classroom environment. Educational Studies. 33(1). 65–80. 7 indexed citations

Hu, Paul Jen‐Hwa, Chienting Lin, & Hsinchun Chen. (2005). User acceptance of Intelligence and Security Informatics technology: A study of COPLINK: Research Articles. 56(3). 235–244. 8 indexed citations

Briggs, Robert O., Chienting Lin, Daniel Mittleman, et al.. (2005). Tools for distributed facilitation. vol.1. 10–10. 9 indexed citations

10.

Hu, Paul Jen‐Hwa, Chienting Lin, & Hsinchun Chen. (2004). User acceptance of Intelligence and Security Informatics technology: A study of COPLINK. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 56(3). 235–244. 40 indexed citations

11.

Zhao, J. Leon, Henry H. Bi, Hsinchun Chen, et al.. (2004). Process-driven collaboration support for intra-agency crime analysis. Decision Support Systems. 41(3). 616–633. 20 indexed citations

12.

Lin, Chienting, Paul Jen‐Hwa Hu, & Hsinchun Chen. (2004). Technology Implementation Management in Law Enforcement. Social Science Computer Review. 22(1). 24–36. 36 indexed citations

13.

Lin, Chienting, et al.. (2003). Technology implementation management in law enforcement: COPLINK system usability and user acceptance evaluations. International Conference on Digital Government Research. 1–4. 7 indexed citations

14.

Lin, Chienting, Hsinchun Chen, & Jay F. Nunamaker. (2003). Verifying the proximity hypothesis for self-organizing maps. 25. 8–8. 14 indexed citations

15.

Lin, Chienting, et al.. (2002). Examining user acceptance of COPLINK technologies by law enforcement officers: a survey study. International Conference on Digital Government Research. 1–7. 3 indexed citations

16.

Lin, Chienting, Hsinchun Chen, & Jay F. Nunamaker. (1999). Verifying the Proximity and Size Hypothesis for Self-Organizing Maps. Journal of Management Information Systems. 16(3). 57–70. 42 indexed citations

17.

Chen, Hsinchun, Bruce R. Schatz, Andrea L. Houston, et al.. (1997). Internet browsing and searching (poster). 257–257. 15 indexed citations

18.

Chen, Hsinchun, et al.. (1996). A parallel computing approach to creating engineering concept spaces for semantic retrieval: the Illinois Digital Library Initiative project. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 18(8). 771–782. 65 indexed citations

19.

Chen, Hsinchun, et al.. (1996). A Parallel Computing Approach to Creating Engineering Concept Spaces for Retrieval: The Illinios Digital Library Initiative Project. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona). 1 indexed citations

20.

Chen, Hsinchun, Bruce R. Schatz, & Chienting Lin. (1995). Concept Classification and Search on Internet Using Machine Learning and Parallel Computing Techniques. UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact