Alexander Pons

579 citations
35 papers · 380 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Alexander Pons

34 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers

Alexander Pons
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Information Systems and Management 99
  • Information Systems 127
  • Signal Processing 50
  • Media Technology 37
  • Computer Networks and Communications 83
Replace Anna Bouch with:
Anna Bouch United Kingdom
Chienting Lin United States
George Hurlburt United States
Hosam F. El-Sofany Egypt
Aleksandra Klašnja‐Milićević Serbia
Christopher Scaffidi United States
Antonio Ruiz‐Martínez Spain
Kai A. Olsen Norway
Sue Black United Kingdom
Adeeb Alsaaidah Jordan
Alexander Pons relative to Anna Bouch United Kingdom Anna Bouch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.2×
Anna Bouch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alexander Pons

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander Pons's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander Pons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander Pons more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander Pons

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander Pons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander Pons. The network helps show where Alexander Pons may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Alexander Pons, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alexander Pons Line = papers co-authored together Alexander Pons links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200374
2 201952
3 200847
4 200437
5 200621
6 200320
7 200917
8 200317
9 201512
10 200611
11 200410
12 20066
13 20026
14 20036
15 20186
16 20095
17
Enhancing the Quality-Of-Service for Application Service Providers
20034
18 20214
19 20173
20 20063

About Alexander Pons

Alexander Pons is a scholar working on Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 35 papers that have together received 380 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Data Storage Technologies (6 papers), Caching and Content Delivery (5 papers), Biometric Identification and Security (4 papers), Real-Time Systems Scheduling (4 papers), Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (3 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (3 papers), Network Security and Intrusion Detection (3 papers) and Embedded Systems Design Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (99 citations), Information Systems (127 citations), Signal Processing (50 citations), Media Technology (37 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (83 citations). Alexander Pons has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Polák, Daniel P. Collins, Aditya Sundararajan, Arif I. Sarwat, Shihab Asfour, Kang K. Yen, Himanshu Upadhyay, Hardik Gohel, Robert Plant and Teresa Lesiuk. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Systems and Software, Journal of Computer Information Systems, Communications of the ACM, International Journal of Information Management and Journal of the Association for Information Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact