Chiao-Chen Chang
About
In The Last Decade
Chiao-Chen Chang
6 papers receiving 344 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Marketing 189
- Plant Science 118
- Sociology and Political Science 101
- Information Systems and Management 91
- Food Science 70
Countries citing papers authored by Chiao-Chen Chang
This map shows the geographic impact of Chiao-Chen Chang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chiao-Chen Chang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chiao-Chen Chang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chiao-Chen Chang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chiao-Chen Chang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chiao-Chen Chang. The network helps show where Chiao-Chen Chang may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chiao-Chen Chang
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chiao-Chen Chang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chiao-Chen Chang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chiao-Chen Chang. Chiao-Chen Chang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 63 | |
| 3 | 185 | |
| 4 | 81 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 31 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.