Cheryl S. McWatters

28 papers receiving 880 citations

Peers

Cheryl S. McWatters
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Management Information Systems 745
  • Strategy and Management 465
  • Management Science and Operations Research 182
  • Accounting 162
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 109
Replace H. Thomas Johnson with:
H. Thomas Johnson United States
Rosemary Fullerton United States
Susan Cohen Kulp United States
Lassâad Lakhal Tunisia
Laura B. Forker United States
Kelvin F. Cross Netherlands
Jean Nollet Canada
C. Droge United States
S. Nazlı Wasti Türkiye
Cheryl S. McWatters relative to H. Thomas Johnson United States H. Thomas Johnson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.5×
H. Thomas Johnson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl S. McWatters

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl S. McWatters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl S. McWatters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl S. McWatters more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl S. McWatters

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl S. McWatters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl S. McWatters. The network helps show where Cheryl S. McWatters may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cheryl S. McWatters

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cheryl S. McWatters. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cheryl S. McWatters based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cheryl S. McWatters. Cheryl S. McWatters is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 1
4 10
5 0
6 7
7 5
8 2
9 9
10 12
11 11
12 12
13 9
14 326
15 6
16 151
17 293
18
Management Accounting: Analysis and Interpretation
18
19 12
20
A History of Canadian Accounting Thought and Practice
10

About Cheryl S. McWatters

Cheryl S. McWatters is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, History and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 972 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Accounting and Organizational Management (11 papers), European Political History Analysis (4 papers) and Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (745 citations), Strategy and Management (465 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (182 citations). Cheryl S. McWatters has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Rosemary Fullerton, Chris Fawson, Yannick Lemarchand, Garry D. Carnegie, Brad Potter, Jerold L. Zimmerman, Dale Morse, Peter Foreman, Chen Qiu and Shujun Ding. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Operations Management, Accounting Organizations and Society and Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026