Cheryl Neilson

638 total citations
10 papers, 445 citations indexed

About

Cheryl Neilson is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Rehabilitation and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Cheryl Neilson has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 445 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in General Health Professions, 3 papers in Rehabilitation and 3 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Cheryl Neilson's work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (2 papers). Cheryl Neilson is often cited by papers focused on Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (2 papers). Cheryl Neilson collaborates with scholars based in Australia. Cheryl Neilson's co-authors include Leeanne M. Carey, Mark Parsons, Isobel J. Hubbard, Robyn O’Halloran, Emma McLaughlin, Shane Erickson, Denise O’Connor, Natasha A. Lannin, Carol McKinstry and Priscilla Ennals and has published in prestigious journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, BMJ Open and International Journal for Quality in Health Care.

In The Last Decade

Cheryl Neilson

10 papers receiving 431 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Cheryl Neilson Australia 6 254 146 95 68 50 10 445
Fernanda Ishida Corrêa Brazil 13 246 1.0× 172 1.2× 54 0.6× 48 0.7× 92 1.8× 63 531
Kimatha Oxford Grice United States 8 162 0.6× 176 1.2× 146 1.5× 62 0.9× 42 0.8× 11 629
Margareta Engardt Sweden 12 317 1.2× 243 1.7× 137 1.4× 60 0.9× 51 1.0× 13 714
Yumi Kim United States 14 249 1.0× 276 1.9× 95 1.0× 42 0.6× 40 0.8× 41 609
Soraia Micaela Silva Brazil 12 250 1.0× 183 1.3× 59 0.6× 33 0.5× 107 2.1× 64 464
Devrim Tarakçı Türkiye 14 208 0.8× 281 1.9× 79 0.8× 39 0.6× 34 0.7× 59 654
Elisabeth Preston Australia 12 272 1.1× 199 1.4× 148 1.6× 74 1.1× 79 1.6× 43 541
Marika Demers Canada 11 315 1.2× 200 1.4× 104 1.1× 32 0.5× 62 1.2× 41 490
Bernhard Borgetto Germany 7 293 1.2× 82 0.6× 108 1.1× 60 0.9× 46 0.9× 37 619
Elizabeth Hill Australia 11 96 0.4× 94 0.6× 69 0.7× 25 0.4× 41 0.8× 29 318

Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl Neilson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl Neilson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl Neilson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl Neilson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl Neilson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl Neilson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl Neilson. The network helps show where Cheryl Neilson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cheryl Neilson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cheryl Neilson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cheryl Neilson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cheryl Neilson. Cheryl Neilson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Carey, Leeanne M., et al.. (2024). Online learning for allied health knowledge translation: A systematic review. 7(1). 1 indexed citations
2.
Howlett, Owen, et al.. (2022). The use of mentoring for knowledge translation by allied health: a scoping review. JBI Evidence Implementation. 20(4). 250–261. 5 indexed citations
4.
Barry, Sinead, et al.. (2020). Love acts and revolutionary praxis: challenging the neoliberal university through a teaching scholars development program. Higher Education Research & Development. 39(1). 81–98. 4 indexed citations
5.
Howlett, Owen, et al.. (2020). Mentoring for knowledge translation in allied health: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evidence Synthesis. 18(10). 2171–2180. 2 indexed citations
6.
Carey, Leeanne M., Natasha A. Lannin, Cheryl Neilson, et al.. (2020). Implementation interventions to promote the uptake of evidence-based practices in stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020(10). 27 indexed citations
7.
Erickson, Shane, et al.. (2020). ‘I was quite surprised it worked so well’: Student and facilitator perspectives of synchronous online Problem Based Learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 58(3). 316–327. 35 indexed citations
8.
Oakman, Jodi, Cheryl Neilson, Nora Shields, et al.. (2020). Effectiveness of health consumer representative involvement in implementation of interventions to change health professional behaviour. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 33(1). 9 indexed citations
9.
Fortune, Tracy, et al.. (2016). Bridging identity ‘chasms’: occupational therapy academics’ reflections on the journey towards scholarship. Teaching in Higher Education. 21(3). 313–325. 20 indexed citations
10.
Hubbard, Isobel J., Mark Parsons, Cheryl Neilson, & Leeanne M. Carey. (2009). Task‐specific training: evidence for and translation to clinical practice. Occupational Therapy International. 16(3-4). 175–189. 330 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026