Cheryl L. Linthicum
- Accounting top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Marketing
- Finance top 10%
- Management Information Systems
- Co-authors
- Juan Manuel SánchezAustin L. ReitengaBjørn JorgensenElizabeth A. GordonDonna L. StreetJeff P. BooneSidney J. GrayMark Taylor
- Topics
- Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (13 papers)Corporate Finance and Governance (9 papers)Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (7 papers)
- Journals
- Review of Accounting StudiesJournal of Accounting and Public PolicyThe British Accounting Review
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Cheryl L. Linthicum
13 papers receiving 288 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
- Accounting 256
- Strategy and Management 212
- Marketing 41
- Finance 41
- Management Information Systems 32
Countries citing papers authored by Cheryl L. Linthicum
This map shows the geographic impact of Cheryl L. Linthicum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheryl L. Linthicum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheryl L. Linthicum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cheryl L. Linthicum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheryl L. Linthicum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheryl L. Linthicum. The network helps show where Cheryl L. Linthicum may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cheryl L. Linthicum
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cheryl L. Linthicum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cheryl L. Linthicum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cheryl L. Linthicum. Cheryl L. Linthicum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | Earnings quality: evidence from Canadian firms’ choice between IFRS and U.S. GAAP | 1 |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | Are IFRS – U.S. GAAP reconciliations informative? | 1 |
| 7 | 29 | |
| 8 | Social Responsibility and Corporate Reputation: The Case of the Arthur Andersen Enron Audit Failure | 16 |
| 9 | Could IFRS Replace US GAAP? A Comparison of Earnings Attributes and Informativeness in the US Market * | 50 |
| 10 | 116 | |
| 11 | 33 | |
| 12 | 19 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 1 |
About Cheryl L. Linthicum
Cheryl L. Linthicum is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Finance, having authored 14 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (13 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (9 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (256 citations), Strategy and Management (212 citations) and Marketing (41 citations). Cheryl L. Linthicum has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Juan Manuel Sánchez, Austin L. Reitenga, Bjørn Jorgensen, Elizabeth A. Gordon, Donna L. Street, Jeff P. Boone, Sidney J. Gray, Mark Taylor, Teri Lombardi Yohn and Kyle E. Murray. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Accounting Studies, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy and The British Accounting Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.