Chenhao Tong

458 citations
17 papers · 290 · h-index 10

Impact in

  • Hepatology top 10%
    • Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
    • Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research

Papers in

Chenhao Tong

17 papers receiving 287 citations

Peers

Chenhao Tong
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Hepatology 85
  • Cancer Research 53
  • Oncology 95
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 111
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 65
Replace Antonino Cassata with:
Antonino Cassata Italy
Ziwen Wei United States
Junjie Hu China
Chong‐De Lu China
E. Falcó Spain
Karen Soussan-Lazard France
P. Merle United States
Thomas Göhler Germany
Kongying Lin China
Chenhao Tong relative to Antonino Cassata Italy Antonino Cassata's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Antonino Cassata · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chenhao Tong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chenhao Tong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chenhao Tong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chenhao Tong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chenhao Tong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chenhao Tong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chenhao Tong. The network helps show where Chenhao Tong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chenhao Tong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chenhao Tong Line = papers co-authored together Chenhao Tong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 202179
2 201962
3 202018
4 202018
5 201918
6 202116
7 202113
8 202012
9 200310
10 202210
11 20208
12 20218
13 20216
14 20225
15 20194
16 20242
17 20251

About Chenhao Tong

Chenhao Tong is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Hepatology and Epidemiology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (7 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (3 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (3 papers), Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis (2 papers), E-commerce and Technology Innovations (2 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (2 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (2 papers) and Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (85 citations), Cancer Research (53 citations), Oncology (95 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (111 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (65 citations). Chenhao Tong has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Sarun Juengpanich, Xiujun Cai, Mingyu Chen, Long Pan, Yifan Wang, Bin Zhang, Jiasheng Cao, Jian Lin, Baochun Lu and Jiahao Hu. Their work appears in journals such as World Journal of Surgical Oncology, PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports, Surgery and Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact