Cheng Cheng
- Molecular Biology
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 10%
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Wenhai SuiFei XueYun ZhangCheng ZhangPanpan HaoJing ChengMeng ZhangXiao‐Hong Wang
- Topics
- Vitamin D Research Studies (5 papers)Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (5 papers)Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineEndocrinology, Diabetes and MetabolismSensory Systems
- Journals
- Journal of Agricultural and Food ChemistryBiochemical and Biophysical Research CommunicationsScience Advances
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesBangladesh
In The Last Decade
Cheng Cheng
61 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Molecular Biology 352
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 212
- Epidemiology 202
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 151
- Surgery 149
Countries citing papers authored by Cheng Cheng
This map shows the geographic impact of Cheng Cheng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Cheng Cheng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cheng Cheng more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Cheng Cheng
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Cheng Cheng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Cheng Cheng. The network helps show where Cheng Cheng may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Cheng Cheng
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Cheng Cheng. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Cheng Cheng based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Cheng Cheng. Cheng Cheng is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 53 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 33 | |
| 8 | 68 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 25 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Cheng Cheng
Cheng Cheng is a scholar working on Physiology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Aging, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vitamin D Research Studies (5 papers), Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (5 papers) and Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (212 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (151 citations) and Sensory Systems (39 citations). Cheng Cheng has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include Wenhai Sui, Fei Xue, Yun Zhang, Cheng Zhang, Panpan Hao, Jing Cheng, Meng Zhang, Xiao‐Hong Wang, Jie Zhang and Cheng Zhang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and Science Advances.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.