Chenchen Zhang
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Chad M. McWhinnieShuqiao YaoJohn R. Z. AbelaXiongzhao ZhuJing XiaoJing ZhouYuan YuanYu Ling
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers)Diabetes and associated disorders (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaOncogeneAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Chenchen Zhang
15 papers receiving 503 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Clinical Psychology 239
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 120
- Education 108
- Social Psychology 79
- Cognitive Neuroscience 55
Countries citing papers authored by Chenchen Zhang
This map shows the geographic impact of Chenchen Zhang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chenchen Zhang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chenchen Zhang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chenchen Zhang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chenchen Zhang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chenchen Zhang. The network helps show where Chenchen Zhang may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chenchen Zhang
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chenchen Zhang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chenchen Zhang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chenchen Zhang. Chenchen Zhang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 52 | |
| 9 | 75 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 65 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 173 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 25 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Chenchen Zhang
Chenchen Zhang is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Periodontics, having authored 20 papers that have together received 514 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers) and Diabetes and associated disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (239 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (120 citations) and Social Psychology (79 citations). Chenchen Zhang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Chad M. McWhinnie, Shuqiao Yao, John R. Z. Abela, Xiongzhao Zhu, Jing Xiao, Jing Zhou, Yuan Yuan, Yu Ling, Juan Yang and Lingyun Li. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Oncogene and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.