Chen Ling

46 papers receiving 547 citations

Peers

Chen Ling
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Atmospheric Science 114
  • Global and Planetary Change 93
  • Communication 29
  • Human-Computer Interaction 22
  • Architecture 6
Replace Qing Tao with:
Qing Tao China
David Harrison United States
Zhichao Cheng China
Joanna Turner Australia
Matthew D. Wood United States
Seung Lee United States
Ronald W. McLeod United Kingdom
Joon-Young Park South Korea
Rick Anderson United States
Chen Ling relative to Qing Tao China Qing Tao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.1×
Qing Tao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chen Ling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chen Ling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chen Ling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chen Ling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chen Ling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chen Ling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chen Ling. The network helps show where Chen Ling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chen Ling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chen Ling Line = papers co-authored together Chen Ling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200271
2 201464
3 201554
4 201341
5 201829
6 202129
7 201723
8 202022
9 201420
10 201917
11 201816
12 199616
13 201015
14 201315
15 201113
16 201611
17 201610
18 20189
19 20119
20 20199

About Chen Ling

Chen Ling is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science and Environmental Engineering, having authored 48 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (11 papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (9 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (4 papers), Risk Perception and Management (4 papers), Air Traffic Management and Optimization (4 papers), Wind and Air Flow Studies (4 papers), Aerospace and Aviation Technology (4 papers) and Data Visualization and Analytics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (114 citations), Global and Planetary Change (93 citations), Communication (29 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (22 citations) and Architecture (6 citations). Chen Ling has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Lans P. Rothfusz, Seyed M. Miran, Randa L. Shehab, William J. Landis, Robin Jacquet, Elizabeth Lowder, Yilu Liu, Bin Qiu, Virgilio Centeno and Christopher D. Karstens. Their work appears in journals such as Weather and Forecasting, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Applied Ergonomics, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction and Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact