Che‐Ming Teng

474 papers receiving 15.2k citations

Peers

Che‐Ming Teng
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
  • Toxicology 833
  • Pharmacology 1.6k
  • Biochemistry 1.3k
  • Pharmacology 2.3k
  • Horticulture 125
Replace Tsong‐Long Hwang with:
Tsong‐Long Hwang Taiwan
Hajime Ohigashi Japan
Masami Ishibashi Japan
Marc Diederich Luxembourg
Yeong Shik Kim South Korea
Vladimı́r Křen Czechia
Anil K. Jaiswal United States
Li Li China
Pengfei Tu China
Yoshinori Fujimoto Japan
Che‐Ming Teng relative to Tsong‐Long Hwang Taiwan Tsong‐Long Hwang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Tsong‐Long Hwang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Che‐Ming Teng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Che‐Ming Teng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Che‐Ming Teng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Che‐Ming Teng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Che‐Ming Teng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Che‐Ming Teng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Che‐Ming Teng. The network helps show where Che‐Ming Teng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Che‐Ming Teng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Che‐Ming Teng Line = papers co-authored together Che‐Ming Teng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 479 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994341
2 1994215
3 1976213
4 1991199
5 1999175
6 1995169
7 1988143
8 2001134
9 1994123
10 1996119
11 1998116
12 1990112
13 2005111
14 1987111
15 2001108
16 2000107
17 1997107
18 2001103
19 1992102
20 1990101

About Che‐Ming Teng

Che‐Ming Teng is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Organic Chemistry, Plant Science and Genetics, having authored 479 papers that have together received 15.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies (60 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (51 papers), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (33 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (31 papers), Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases (30 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (24 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (24 papers) and Synthesis of Organic Compounds (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (833 citations), Pharmacology (1.6k citations), Biochemistry (1.3k citations), Pharmacology (2.3k citations) and Horticulture (125 citations). Che‐Ming Teng has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Feng‐Nien Ko, Tur‐Fu Huang, Chaoho Ouyang, Jih‐Hwa Guh, Shiow‐Lin Pan, Chin‐Chung Wu, Yang‐Chang Wu, Sheng‐Chu Kuo, Jih-Pyang Wang and Tian-Shung Wu. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pharmacology, Journal of Natural Products, British Journal of Pharmacology, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology and Planta Medica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact