Che‐Ming Teng
Impact in
- Toxicology top 0.05%
- Bioactive Compounds and Antitumor Agents
- Pharmacology top 0.05%
Papers in
-
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 31
- Pharmacology 114
- Synthesis of Organic Compounds 24
- Co-authors
- Feng‐Nien Ko (97 shared papers)Tur‐Fu Huang (54 shared papers)Chaoho Ouyang (36 shared papers)Jih‐Hwa Guh (66 shared papers)Shiow‐Lin Pan (72 shared papers)Chin‐Chung Wu (23 shared papers)Yang‐Chang Wu (28 shared papers)Sheng‐Chu Kuo (32 shared papers)
- Journals
- European Journal of Pharmacology (34 papers)Journal of Natural Products (23 papers)British Journal of Pharmacology (23 papers)Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology (22 papers)Planta Medica (22 papers)
- Partner nations
- TaiwanUnited StatesJapan
In The Last Decade
Che‐Ming Teng
474 papers receiving 15.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
- Toxicology 833
- Pharmacology 1.6k
- Biochemistry 1.3k
- Pharmacology 2.3k
- Horticulture 125
Countries citing papers authored by Che‐Ming Teng
This map shows the geographic impact of Che‐Ming Teng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Che‐Ming Teng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Che‐Ming Teng more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Che‐Ming Teng
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Che‐Ming Teng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Che‐Ming Teng. The network helps show where Che‐Ming Teng may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Che‐Ming Teng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 479 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1994 | 341 | |
| 2 | 1994 | 215 | |
| 3 | 1976 | 213 | |
| 4 | 1991 | 199 | |
| 5 | 1999 | 175 | |
| 6 | 1995 | 169 | |
| 7 | 1988 | 143 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 134 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 123 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 119 | |
| 11 | 1998 | 116 | |
| 12 | 1990 | 112 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 111 | |
| 14 | 1987 | 111 | |
| 15 | 2001 | 108 | |
| 16 | 2000 | 107 | |
| 17 | 1997 | 107 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 103 | |
| 19 | 1992 | 102 | |
| 20 | 1990 | 101 |
About Che‐Ming Teng
Che‐Ming Teng is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Organic Chemistry, Plant Science and Genetics, having authored 479 papers that have together received 15.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies (60 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (51 papers), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (33 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (31 papers), Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases (30 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (24 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (24 papers) and Synthesis of Organic Compounds (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (833 citations), Pharmacology (1.6k citations), Biochemistry (1.3k citations), Pharmacology (2.3k citations) and Horticulture (125 citations). Che‐Ming Teng has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Feng‐Nien Ko, Tur‐Fu Huang, Chaoho Ouyang, Jih‐Hwa Guh, Shiow‐Lin Pan, Chin‐Chung Wu, Yang‐Chang Wu, Sheng‐Chu Kuo, Jih-Pyang Wang and Tian-Shung Wu. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Pharmacology, Journal of Natural Products, British Journal of Pharmacology, Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology and Planta Medica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.