Michelle C. Quist
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Jennifer L. BryanChelsie M. YoungDawn W. FosterBenedict C. JonesLisa M. DeBruineChristopher D. WatkinsFinlay G. SmithMai‐Ly N. Steers
- Topics
- Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (8 papers)Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers)Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (4 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPersonality and Individual DifferencesJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomDenmark
In The Last Decade
Michelle C. Quist
18 papers receiving 338 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 151
- Clinical Psychology 116
- Sociology and Political Science 102
- Social Psychology 86
- Cognitive Neuroscience 58
Countries citing papers authored by Michelle C. Quist
This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle C. Quist's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle C. Quist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle C. Quist more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle C. Quist
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle C. Quist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle C. Quist. The network helps show where Michelle C. Quist may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michelle C. Quist
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michelle C. Quist. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michelle C. Quist based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michelle C. Quist. Michelle C. Quist is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | |
| 2 | 27 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | Opposite-sex siblings decrease attraction, but not prosocial attributions, to self-resembling opposite-sex faces | 4 |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 34 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 31 | |
| 18 | 18 |
About Michelle C. Quist
Michelle C. Quist is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology and Marketing, having authored 18 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (8 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers) and Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (151 citations), Applied Psychology (48 citations) and Clinical Psychology (116 citations). Michelle C. Quist has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer L. Bryan, Chelsie M. Young, Dawn W. Foster, Benedict C. Jones, Lisa M. DeBruine, Christopher D. Watkins, Finlay G. Smith, Mai‐Ly N. Steers, Anthony C. Little and Clayton Neighbors. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Personality and Individual Differences and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.