Chelse M. Prather
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Insect Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Angela LawsJohn S. KominoskiElise S. GornishAnthony JoernChuan‐Kai HoShannon L. PeliniChristopher P. BlochIsrael Del Toro
- Topics
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (15 papers)Plant and animal studies (13 papers)Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (7 papers)
- Cited by
- Ecological ModelingNature and Landscape ConservationEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Journals
- PLoS ONEEcologyEcology Letters
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Chelse M. Prather
24 papers receiving 531 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 220
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 200
- Ecology 196
- Global and Planetary Change 112
- Insect Science 106
Countries citing papers authored by Chelse M. Prather
This map shows the geographic impact of Chelse M. Prather's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chelse M. Prather with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chelse M. Prather more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Chelse M. Prather
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chelse M. Prather. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chelse M. Prather. The network helps show where Chelse M. Prather may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Chelse M. Prather
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Chelse M. Prather. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Chelse M. Prather based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Chelse M. Prather. Chelse M. Prather is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 40 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 36 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 220 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 26 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Chelse M. Prather
Chelse M. Prather is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 547 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (15 papers), Plant and animal studies (13 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (92 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (220 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (200 citations). Chelse M. Prather has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Angela Laws, John S. Kominoski, Elise S. Gornish, Anthony Joern, Chuan‐Kai Ho, Shannon L. Pelini, Christopher P. Bloch, Israel Del Toro, Emily B. Rivest and Tim Newbold. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Ecology and Ecology Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.