Ernest D. Osburn

965 total citations
22 papers, 706 citations indexed

About

Ernest D. Osburn is a scholar working on Ecology, Soil Science and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ernest D. Osburn has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 706 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Ecology, 14 papers in Soil Science and 7 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Ernest D. Osburn's work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (13 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (13 papers) and Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (5 papers). Ernest D. Osburn is often cited by papers focused on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (13 papers), Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (13 papers) and Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (5 papers). Ernest D. Osburn collaborates with scholars based in United States, Denmark and Estonia. Ernest D. Osburn's co-authors include Michael S. Strickland, J. Barrett, Christian L. Lauber, Mark A. Bradford, Noah Fierer, Frank O. Aylward, Steven G. McBride, Brian D. Badgley, Brian D. Strahm and Matthias C. Rillig and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Ecology and Soil Biology and Biochemistry.

In The Last Decade

Ernest D. Osburn

21 papers receiving 692 citations

Peers

Ernest D. Osburn
Lihua Lu China
G. Kenny Png Singapore
Mark Anthony United States
Beth Brockett United Kingdom
Nadine Thomas United Kingdom
Peng Dang China
Lihua Lu China
Ernest D. Osburn
Citations per year, relative to Ernest D. Osburn Ernest D. Osburn (= 1×) peers Lihua Lu

Countries citing papers authored by Ernest D. Osburn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ernest D. Osburn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ernest D. Osburn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ernest D. Osburn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ernest D. Osburn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ernest D. Osburn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ernest D. Osburn. The network helps show where Ernest D. Osburn may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ernest D. Osburn

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ernest D. Osburn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ernest D. Osburn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ernest D. Osburn. Ernest D. Osburn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Osburn, Ernest D., JL Weissman, Michael S. Strickland, et al.. (2025). Relative abundances of bacterial phyla are strong indicators of community-scale microbial growth rates in soil. Environmental Microbiome. 20(1). 131–131.
2.
Viketoft, Maria, Jan Bengtsson, Joachim Strengbom, et al.. (2025). Functional diversity of soil microbial communities increases with ecosystem development. Nature Communications. 16(1). 10408–10408. 1 indexed citations
3.
Osburn, Ernest D., Steven G. McBride, Mohammad Bahram, & Michael S. Strickland. (2024). Global patterns in the growth potential of soil bacterial communities. Nature Communications. 15(1). 6881–6881. 18 indexed citations
4.
Osburn, Ernest D., Sara G. Baer, Sarah E. Evans, Steven G. McBride, & Michael S. Strickland. (2024). Effects of experimentally elevated virus abundance on soil carbon cycling across varying ecosystem types. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 198. 109556–109556. 8 indexed citations
5.
Osburn, Ernest D., Steven G. McBride, & Michael S. Strickland. (2024). Microbial dark matter could add uncertainties to metagenomic trait estimations. Nature Microbiology. 9(6). 1427–1430. 7 indexed citations
6.
Osburn, Ernest D., et al.. (2023). Disturbance of eucalypt forests alters the composition, function, and assembly of soil microbial communities. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 99(9). 2 indexed citations
7.
Osburn, Ernest D., Gaowen Yang, Matthias C. Rillig, & Michael S. Strickland. (2023). Evaluating the role of bacterial diversity in supporting soil ecosystem functions under anthropogenic stress. ISME Communications. 3(1). 66–66. 53 indexed citations
8.
McBride, Steven G., et al.. (2022). Volatile and Dissolved Organic Carbon Sources Have Distinct Effects on Microbial Activity, Nitrogen Content, and Bacterial Communities in Soil. Microbial Ecology. 85(2). 659–668. 13 indexed citations
9.
Osburn, Ernest D., Steven G. McBride, Jim A. Nelson, et al.. (2022). Accurate detection of soil microbial community responses to environmental change requires the use of multiple methods. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 169. 108685–108685. 14 indexed citations
10.
Osburn, Ernest D., et al.. (2022). Effects of micronutrient fertilization on soil carbon pools and microbial community functioning. Applied Soil Ecology. 181. 104664–104664. 6 indexed citations
11.
Osburn, Ernest D., et al.. (2022). Evaluating the roles of microbial functional breadth and home‐field advantage in leaf litter decomposition. Functional Ecology. 36(5). 1258–1267. 28 indexed citations
12.
Osburn, Ernest D., Brian D. Badgley, Brian D. Strahm, Frank O. Aylward, & J. Barrett. (2021). Emergent properties of microbial communities drive accelerated biogeochemical cycling in disturbed temperate forests. Ecology. 102(12). e03553–e03553. 25 indexed citations
13.
Osburn, Ernest D., et al.. (2021). Land Use History Mediates Soil Biogeochemical Responses to Drought in Temperate Forest Ecosystems. Ecosystems. 25(1). 75–90. 9 indexed citations
14.
Osburn, Ernest D., Frank O. Aylward, & J. Barrett. (2021). Historical land use has long-term effects on microbial community assembly processes in forest soils. ISME Communications. 1(1). 48–48. 64 indexed citations
15.
Osburn, Ernest D., Chelcy Ford Miniat, Katherine J. Elliott, & J. Barrett. (2021). Effects of Rhododendron removal on soil bacterial and fungal communities in southern Appalachian forests. Forest Ecology and Management. 496. 119398–119398. 3 indexed citations
16.
Osburn, Ernest D., Steven G. McBride, & J. Barrett. (2021). Historical forest disturbance reduces soil microbial efficiency across multiple carbon sources. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 165. 108542–108542. 4 indexed citations
17.
Osburn, Ernest D., Brian D. Badgley, Frank O. Aylward, & J. Barrett. (2021). Historical forest disturbance mediates soil microbial community responses to drought. Environmental Microbiology. 23(11). 6405–6419. 13 indexed citations
18.
McBride, Steven G., Ernest D. Osburn, J. Barrett, & Michael S. Strickland. (2019). Volatile methanol and acetone additions increase labile soil carbon and inhibit nitrification. Biogeochemistry. 145(1-2). 127–140. 18 indexed citations
19.
Osburn, Ernest D., Steven G. McBride, Frank O. Aylward, et al.. (2019). Soil Bacterial and Fungal Communities Exhibit Distinct Long-Term Responses to Disturbance in Temperate Forests. Frontiers in Microbiology. 10. 2872–2872. 45 indexed citations
20.
Strickland, Michael S., Ernest D. Osburn, Christian L. Lauber, Noah Fierer, & Mark A. Bradford. (2008). Litter quality is in the eye of the beholder: initial decomposition rates as a function of inoculum characteristics. Functional Ecology. 23(3). 627–636. 281 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026