Charlotte Cross
- Health top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Co-authors
- Victoria L. BanyardKathryn L. ModeckiLydia GoehrIsabel S. MooreKelly J. AshfordPhares MujinjaMaureen MackintoshMarc Wuyts
- Topics
- Musicology and Musical Analysis (6 papers)Music Technology and Sound Studies (5 papers)Diverse Musicological Studies (3 papers)
- Cited by
- HealthGender StudiesMusic
- Journals
- BMC Health Services ResearchJournal of Interpersonal ViolenceEuropean Journal of Public Health
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesTanzania
In The Last Decade
Charlotte Cross
14 papers receiving 514 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Health 343
- Sociology and Political Science 190
- General Health Professions 185
- Clinical Psychology 181
- Gender Studies 139
Countries citing papers authored by Charlotte Cross
This map shows the geographic impact of Charlotte Cross's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charlotte Cross with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charlotte Cross more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charlotte Cross
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charlotte Cross. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charlotte Cross. The network helps show where Charlotte Cross may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charlotte Cross
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charlotte Cross. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charlotte Cross based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charlotte Cross. Charlotte Cross is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 48 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | Two Undated Manuscripts from Schoenberg's "Gedanke" Project | 1 |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | The Tonal Problem as a Method of Analysis | 5 |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 303 | |
| 12 | 106 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | Schoenberg and words : the modernist years | 6 |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 11 |
About Charlotte Cross
Charlotte Cross is a scholar working on Music, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Health, having authored 17 papers that have together received 568 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musicology and Musical Analysis (6 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (5 papers) and Diverse Musicological Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (343 citations), Gender Studies (139 citations) and Music (39 citations). Charlotte Cross has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Tanzania. Frequent co-authors include Victoria L. Banyard, Kathryn L. Modecki, Lydia Goehr, Isabel S. Moore, Kelly J. Ashford, Phares Mujinja, Maureen Mackintosh, Marc Wuyts, Arnold Schoenberg and Twalib Ngoma. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Health Services Research, Journal of Interpersonal Violence and European Journal of Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.