Charles Whittaker
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Modeling and Simulation top 5%
- Co-authors
- M. S. SkolnickD. N. KrizhanovskiiEdmund ClarkeB. RoyallI. A. ShelykhP. M. WalkerE. CancellieriD. M. Whittaker
- Topics
- Strong Light-Matter Interactions (9 papers)Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research (4 papers)Quantum and electron transport phenomena (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomRussiaIceland
In The Last Decade
Charles Whittaker
12 papers receiving 367 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 262
- Biomedical Engineering 69
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 53
- Civil and Structural Engineering 51
- Modeling and Simulation 46
Countries citing papers authored by Charles Whittaker
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Whittaker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Whittaker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Whittaker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Whittaker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Whittaker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Whittaker. The network helps show where Charles Whittaker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles Whittaker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles Whittaker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles Whittaker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles Whittaker. Charles Whittaker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 81 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 50 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 115 | |
| 12 | Polariton Pattern Formation and Photon Statistics of the Associated Emission
\n
\n | 17 |
About Charles Whittaker
Charles Whittaker is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Modeling and Simulation and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Strong Light-Matter Interactions (9 papers), Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research (4 papers) and Quantum and electron transport phenomena (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (46 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (262 citations) and Acoustics and Ultrasonics (3 citations). Charles Whittaker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Russia and Iceland. Frequent co-authors include M. S. Skolnick, D. N. Krizhanovskii, Edmund Clarke, B. Royall, I. A. Shelykh, P. M. Walker, E. Cancellieri, D. M. Whittaker, Henning Schomerus and Neil M. Ferguson. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Applied Physics Letters and Nature Photonics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.