Charles W. E. Redman

50 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Charles W. E. Redman
Comparison fields: 5 of 149
  • Reproductive Medicine 257
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 132
  • Epidemiology 506
  • Oncology 192
  • Surgery 167
Replace Mellissa H. Withers with:
Mellissa H. Withers United States
Laura M. Woods United Kingdom
Aubert Agostini France
Ondrej Majek Czechia
Andrea Marcellusi Italy
Isabel C. Garcés-Palacio Colombia
Kate T. Simms Australia
MARC GAMERRE France
Ngoc Minh Nguyen Vietnam
Inge Driesprong-de Kok Netherlands
Charles W. E. Redman relative to Mellissa H. Withers United States Mellissa H. Withers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Mellissa H. Withers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles W. E. Redman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles W. E. Redman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles W. E. Redman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles W. E. Redman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles W. E. Redman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles W. E. Redman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles W. E. Redman. The network helps show where Charles W. E. Redman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Charles W. E. Redman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles W. E. Redman Line = papers co-authored together Charles W. E. Redman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005418
2 2017238
3 2018217
4 199473
5 199043
6 202041
7 201940
8 201738
9 201636
10 201729
11 201327
12 201224
13 201823
14 201221
15 199220
16 200219
17 201217
18 201417
19 201717
20 200416

About Charles W. E. Redman

Charles W. E. Redman is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Reproductive Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (27 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (9 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (4 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Genital Health and Disease (3 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers), Cell death mechanisms and regulation (2 papers) and Cancer Mechanisms and Therapy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (257 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (132 citations), Epidemiology (506 citations), Oncology (192 citations) and Surgery (167 citations). Charles W. E. Redman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Finland and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Shakila Thangaratinam, Esther Louise Moss, Pekka Nieminen, Simon C. Leeson, Christine Bergeron, Karl Ulrich Petry, Marc Arbyn, Maria Kyrgiou, Olaf Reich and Menelaos Tzafetas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, The Lancet Oncology and BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact