Charles W. Dean
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Health top 5%
- General Health Professions
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Robert BrameAlex R. PiqueroPaul MazerolleJ. David HirschelIra W. HutchisonRaymond PaternosterRay PaternosterThomas J. Duggan
- Topics
- Crime Patterns and Interventions (10 papers)Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers)Intimate Partner and Family Violence (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaMexico
In The Last Decade
Charles W. Dean
21 papers receiving 681 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Sociology and Political Science 620
- Clinical Psychology 299
- Health 202
- General Health Professions 77
- Epidemiology 61
Countries citing papers authored by Charles W. Dean
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles W. Dean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles W. Dean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles W. Dean more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles W. Dean
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles W. Dean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles W. Dean. The network helps show where Charles W. Dean may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles W. Dean
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles W. Dean. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles W. Dean based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles W. Dean. Charles W. Dean is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | Social Work and Police Partnership: A Summons To The Village Strategies and Effective Practices | 6 |
| 3 | 145 | |
| 4 | 48 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 68 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 54 | |
| 11 | Cash Traps: Small Business Secrets for Reducing Costs and Improving Cash Flow | 1 |
| 12 | 53 | |
| 13 | 96 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 23 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Charles W. Dean
Charles W. Dean is a scholar working on Human Factors and Ergonomics, Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 23 papers that have together received 794 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (10 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (202 citations), Sociology and Political Science (620 citations) and Clinical Psychology (299 citations). Charles W. Dean has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Robert Brame, Alex R. Piquero, Paul Mazerolle, J. David Hirschel, Ira W. Hutchison, Raymond Paternoster, Ray Paternoster, Thomas J. Duggan and N. Dickon Reppucci. Their work appears in journals such as Criminology, Technovation and American Journal of Community Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.