Charles T. Scott
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 2%
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Environmental Engineering top 2%
- Ecology top 5%
- Insect Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- William A. BechtoldAnantha PrasadLouis R. IversonMartin E. DaleJames A. WestfallAndrew J. ListerGregory A. ReamsMichael Köhl
- Topics
- Forest ecology and management (31 papers)Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (19 papers)Forest Management and Policy (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanySwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Charles T. Scott
58 papers receiving 823 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 607
- Global and Planetary Change 490
- Environmental Engineering 403
- Ecology 347
- Insect Science 108
Countries citing papers authored by Charles T. Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles T. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles T. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles T. Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles T. Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles T. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles T. Scott. The network helps show where Charles T. Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles T. Scott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles T. Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles T. Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles T. Scott. Charles T. Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 38 | |
| 6 | 39 | |
| 7 | 32 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 105 | |
| 10 | Northeastern FIA Tree Taper Study: Current Status and Future Work | 1 |
| 11 | The forest inventory and analysis plot design | 64 |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | Assessing Regeneration Adequacy In Pennsylvania's Forests: A Pilot Study | 4 |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Persian and Arabic riddles : a language-centered approach to genre definition | 10 |
About Charles T. Scott
Charles T. Scott is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Environmental Engineering and Linguistics and Language, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (31 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (19 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (607 citations), Environmental Engineering (403 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (490 citations). Charles T. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include William A. Bechtold, Anantha Prasad, Louis R. Iverson, Martin E. Dale, James A. Westfall, Andrew J. Lister, Gregory A. Reams, Michael Köhl, Paul L. Patterson and Ronald E. McRoberts. Their work appears in journals such as Human Molecular Genetics, Ecological Applications and Language.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.