Edwin J. Green
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Environmental Engineering top 5%
- Statistics and Probability top 5%
- Mechanical Engineering
- Co-authors
- William E. StrawdermanDavid D. ReedDavid W. MacFarlaneHarry T. ValentineHarold E. BurkhartFrancis A. RoeschCharles T. ScottGeorge C. Hamilton
- Topics
- Forest ecology and management (25 papers)Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (13 papers)Forest Management and Policy (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsDenmark
In The Last Decade
Edwin J. Green
43 papers receiving 513 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 332
- Global and Planetary Change 251
- Environmental Engineering 189
- Statistics and Probability 92
- Mechanical Engineering 73
Countries citing papers authored by Edwin J. Green
This map shows the geographic impact of Edwin J. Green's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edwin J. Green with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edwin J. Green more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edwin J. Green
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edwin J. Green. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edwin J. Green. The network helps show where Edwin J. Green may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edwin J. Green
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edwin J. Green. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edwin J. Green based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edwin J. Green. Edwin J. Green is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 59 | |
| 3 | Comparing spatial and non-spatial approaches for predicting forest soil organic carbon at unsampled locations | 2 |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 47 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 42 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 40 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 19 | 51 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Edwin J. Green
Edwin J. Green is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Environmental Engineering and Statistics and Probability, having authored 45 papers that have together received 600 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (25 papers), Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (13 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (332 citations), Environmental Engineering (189 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (251 citations). Edwin J. Green has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include William E. Strawderman, David D. Reed, David W. MacFarlane, Harry T. Valentine, Harold E. Burkhart, Francis A. Roesch, Charles T. Scott, George C. Hamilton, Ralph L. Amateis and A. F. M. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Journal of the American Statistical Association and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.