Charles Swartz

81 papers receiving 509 citations

Peers

Charles Swartz
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Mathematical Physics 334
  • Statistics and Probability 242
  • Applied Mathematics 239
  • Geometry and Topology 115
  • Algebra and Number Theory 49
Replace И. В. Островскии with:
И. В. Островскии Türkiye
Gavin Brown Australia
Mansoor Saburov Malaysia
Nicolas Bouleau France
Robert Whitley United States
J. Marshall Ash United States
Scott N. Armstrong United States
Eugene Lytvynov United Kingdom
正次 辻 United Kingdom
John V. Ryff United States
Charles Swartz relative to И. В. Островскии Türkiye И. В. Островскии's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
И. В. Островскии · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Charles Swartz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Charles Swartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles Swartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles Swartz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Charles Swartz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles Swartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles Swartz. The network helps show where Charles Swartz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Charles Swartz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Charles Swartz Line = papers co-authored together Charles Swartz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 94 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198555
2 200254
3 199634
4 200133
5 201328
6 199426
7 197322
8 198321
9 200820
10 200819
11 200416
12
Theories of Integration: The Integrals of Riemann, Lebesgue, Henstock-Kurzweil, and McShane
200416
13 200114
14 201213
15 197510
16 20099
17 19988
18 20128
19 19958
20 19878

About Charles Swartz

Charles Swartz is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Statistics and Probability, Applied Mathematics, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Geometry and Topology, having authored 94 papers that have together received 614 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Banach Space Theory (49 papers), Approximation Theory and Sequence Spaces (38 papers), Optimization and Variational Analysis (16 papers), Fixed Point Theorems Analysis (11 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (8 papers), Holomorphic and Operator Theory (7 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (6 papers) and Functional Equations Stability Results (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (334 citations), Statistics and Probability (242 citations), Applied Mathematics (239 citations), Geometry and Topology (115 citations) and Algebra and Number Theory (49 citations). Charles Swartz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Piotr Antosik, Xifan Wu, Susan Saegert, Gary Winkel, Douglas S. Kurtz, Gladys H. Telang, Junde Wu, Johann Boos, Brian S. Thomson and Shin Min Kang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Studia Mathematica, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications and Boletín de la Sociedad Matemática Mexicana.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact