Charles S. Mirabile
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Automotive Engineering top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Topics
- Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (10 papers)Vestibular and auditory disorders (3 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
Charles S. Mirabile
21 papers receiving 397 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Cognitive Neuroscience 246
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 99
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 87
- Automotive Engineering 84
- Social Psychology 66
Countries citing papers authored by Charles S. Mirabile
This map shows the geographic impact of Charles S. Mirabile's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Charles S. Mirabile with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Charles S. Mirabile more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Charles S. Mirabile
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Charles S. Mirabile. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Charles S. Mirabile. The network helps show where Charles S. Mirabile may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Charles S. Mirabile
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Charles S. Mirabile. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Charles S. Mirabile based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Charles S. Mirabile. Charles S. Mirabile is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anesthetic management for right upper extremity amputation due to recidivous cutaneous carcinoma and acute postoperative pain control in patients affected by epidermolysis bullosa. | 6 |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 320 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 24 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Charles S. Mirabile
Charles S. Mirabile is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Neurology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 22 papers that have together received 449 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (10 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (3 papers) and Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (246 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (47 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (99 citations). Charles S. Mirabile has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Bernard Glueck, Charles F. Stroebel, G N Bowers, Martin R. Ford, Martin H. Teicher and Marco Olivieri. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, American Journal of Psychiatry and The Journal of Urology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.